Aviation security considerations : expedited passenger screening and modification of prohibited items list /
Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
---|---|
Otros Autores: | |
Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
New York :
Novinka,
2015.
|
Colección: | Transportation issues, policies and R & D series.
|
Temas: | |
Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Passenger Eligibility Based on Real Time Threat Assessments Using Managed Inclusion ProcessManaged Inclusion Process ; TSA Should Ensure that Its Effectiveness Testing of the Managed Inclusion Process is Conducted in Accordance with Established Methodological Practices ; TSA COULD IMPROVE PROGRAM ASSESSMENT BY ALIGNING GOALS WITH MEASURES AND HAS ESTIMATED SAVINGS FROM EXPEDITED SCREENING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 ; TSA's Expedited Screening Performance Measure Does Not Accurately Link to Goals on Passenger Eligibility
- TSA's Fiscal Year 2015 Budget Estimates Savings Resulting from Expedited Screening Programs CONCLUSION ; RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION; AGENCY COMMENTS AND OUR EVALUATION ; APPENDIX I: LISTING OF 118 AIRPORTS AT WHICH TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (TSA) OFFERS EXPEDITED SCREENING WITH DEDICATED SCREENING LANES AS OF APRIL 2014 ; End Notes; Chapter 2 AVIATION SECURITY: TSA SHOULD TAKE ADDITIONAL ACTION TO OBTAIN STAKEHOLDER INPUT WHEN MODIFYING THE PROHIBITED ITEMS LIST ; ABBREVIATIONS; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY ; WHAT GAO RECOMMENDS ; WHAT GAO FOUND; BACKGROUND
- TSA Authority Passenger Checkpoint Screening ; Modifications to the Prohibited Items List; TSA CONSIDERS SEVERAL FACTORS WHEN MODIFYING THE PIL, BUT DID NOT FULLY ASSESS RISK OR STAKEHOLDER PERSPECTIVES WHEN EVALUATING ITS SMALL KNIVES PROPOSAL ; TSA Considers Several Factors when Evaluating Potential PIL Modifications ; TSA Did Not Fully Assess Risk Prior to Its Decision to Remove Small Knives from the PIL ; TSA Did Not Adequately Obtain Stakeholder Perspectives when Evaluating Its Small Knives Proposal