Implied consent and sexual assault : intimate relationships, autonomy, and voice /

Afficher d'autres versions (1)

"In R. v. Ewanchuk, the Supreme Court of Canada held that sexual touching must be accompanied by express, contemporaneous consent. In doing so, the Court rejected the idea that sexual consent could be 'implied'. Ewanchuk was a landmark ruling, reflecting a powerful commitment to women...

Description complète

Détails bibliographiques
Cote:Libro Electrónico
Auteur principal: Plaxton, Michael, 1975- (Auteur)
Format: Électronique eBook
Langue:Inglés
Publié: Montreal ; Kingston : McGill-Queen's University Press, 2015.
Sujets:
Sexual consent > Canada.
Rape > Law and legislation > Canada.
Sex crimes > Law and legislation > Canada.
Women > Legal status, laws, etc. > Canada.
Man-woman relationships > Canada.
Consentement sexuel > Canada.
Viol > Droit > Législation > Canada.
Crimes sexuels > Droit > Législation > Canada.
Femmes > Droit > Canada.
Relations entre hommes et femmes > Canada.
LAW > Criminal Law > General.
Man-woman relationships
Rape > Law and legislation
Sex crimes > Law and legislation
Sexual consent
Women > Legal status, laws, etc.
Sexualbrott > juridik och lagstiftning.
Våldtäkt > juridik och lagstiftning.
Canada
Accès en ligne:Texto completo

Internet

Texto completo

Items no disponibles

Informations d'exemplaires de

Documents similaires