Medical confidentiality and legal privilege /

Afficher d'autres versions (1)

McHale asks why a doctor can be forced to disclose a patients' confidences in court when other professional confidences are protected. She goes on to look at whether doctors keep patients' confidences and the need for statutory reform.

Détails bibliographiques
Cote:Libro Electrónico
Auteur principal: McHale, Jean V. (Jean Vanessa), 1965-
Format: Électronique eBook
Langue:Inglés
Publié: London ; New York : Routledge, 1993.
Collection:Social ethics and policy series.
Sujets:
Confidential communications > Physicians > Great Britain.
Medical records > Law and legislation > Great Britain.
AIDS (Disease) > Law and legislation > Great Britain.
Confidentiality > legislation & jurisprudence
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome > legislation & jurisprudence
Medical Records > legislation & jurisprudence
Médecine > Secret professionnel > Grande-Bretagne.
LAW > Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice.
AIDS (Disease) > Law and legislation
Confidential communications > Physicians
Medical records > Law and legislation
Dossiers médicaux > Accès > Contrôle.
United Kingdom
Great Britain
Medical records > Disclosure > Law
Accès en ligne:Texto completo
Table des matières:
  • Book Cover; Title; Contents; Preface; Table of cases; SHOULD THE DOCTOR TELL?; COMPARISONS AND INCONSISTENCIES; CONFIDENTIALITY: A PRINCIPLE TO BE PROTECTED?; CONFIDENTIALITY: RHETORIC OR REALITY?; PRACTICAL PROBLEMS IN PRIVILEGE ENACTMENT; MEDICAL PRIVILEGE, COSTS AND APPLICATION; Notes; Index.

Documents similaires