Cargando…

No Undocumented Child Left Behind : Plyler v. Doe and the Education of Undocumented Schoolchildren /

The 1982 U.S. Supreme Court case of Plyler v. Doe, which made it possible for undocumented children to enroll in Texas public schools, was a watershed moment for immigrant rights in the United States. The Court struck down both a state statute denying funding for education to undocumented children a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Olivas, Michael A. (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: New York : New York University Press, 2012.
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_14595
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905041610.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 111228s2012 nyu o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9780814762455 
020 |z 9780814762448 
035 |a (OCoLC)858699883 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Olivas, Michael A.,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a No Undocumented Child Left Behind :   |b Plyler v. Doe and the Education of Undocumented Schoolchildren /   |c Michael A. Olivas. 
264 1 |a New York :  |b New York University Press,  |c 2012. 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2012 
264 4 |c ©2012. 
300 |a 1 online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 0 |a Citizenship and migration in the Americas 
505 0 |a Why Plyler matters -- The story of Plyler v. Doe : the education of undocumented children, and the polity -- The implementation of Plyler v. Doe -- The political economy of the DREAM Act and the legislative process : Doe goes to college -- Conclusion : the discourse and the danger (or, why Plyler should have been decided on preemption grounds). 
520 |a The 1982 U.S. Supreme Court case of Plyler v. Doe, which made it possible for undocumented children to enroll in Texas public schools, was a watershed moment for immigrant rights in the United States. The Court struck down both a state statute denying funding for education to undocumented children and a municipal school district's attempt to charge an annual 1,000 tuition fee for each undocumented student to compensate for the lost state funding. Yet while this case has not returned to the Supreme Court, it is frequently contested at the state and local level. In No Undocumented Child Left Be. 
546 |a English. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 7 |a Noncitizens.  |2 sears 
650 7 |a Children of noncitizens  |x Education  |x Law and legislation.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01902764 
650 7 |a Noncitizens.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00805278 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice.  |2 bisacsh 
650 6 |a Immigrants clandestins. 
650 2 |a Undocumented Immigrants 
650 0 |a Noncitizens. 
650 0 |a Illegal immigration  |x Law and legislation  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Children of noncitizens  |x Education  |x Law and legislation  |z United States. 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/14595/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2012 Complete 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2012 Political Science and Policy Studies