It's All in the Game : A Nonfoundationalist Account of Law and Adjudication /

Mostrar otras versiones (1)

The author argues for an understanding of judging that rejects foundationalism (the effort to ground legal thought on something), attempts to carve out a "middle way" between formalist and the political visions of law, and offers a reconceptual.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hutchinson, Allan C., 1951- (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: London : Duke University Press, 2000.
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Law > Political aspects
Law > Philosophy
Law > Methodology
Judicial process
Droit > Aspect politique.
Processus judiciaire.
Law > Political aspects.
Judicial process.
Law > Methodology.
Law > Philosophy.
Electronic books.
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_71113
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905051328.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 030530t20002000ncu o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9780822380429 
020 |z 9780822324287 
035 |a (OCoLC)1141520804 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Hutchinson, Allan C.,  |d 1951-  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a It's All in the Game :   |b A Nonfoundationalist Account of Law and Adjudication /   |c Allan C. Hutchinson. 
264 1 |a London :  |b Duke University Press,  |c 2000. 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2020 
264 4 |c ©2000. 
300 |a 1 online resource (389 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
505 0 |a Playing the Game: An Introduction -- It's All in the Game: Adjudication in a Nonfoundationalist Way -- The Language Game: From Ambiguity to Indeterminacy -- Playing with Authority: Interpretation and Identity -- A Pure Way of Playing: The Naturalist Revival -- At Play in the Fields of Law: The Reasoning Game -- Playing by the Rules: A Good Faith Approach -- Calling the Shots: The Development of Legal Doctrine -- Playing Politics: Putting Poetry in Motion -- Playing with the Rules: Experiments in Judging -- Overtime? A Conclusion. 
520 |a The author argues for an understanding of judging that rejects foundationalism (the effort to ground legal thought on something), attempts to carve out a "middle way" between formalist and the political visions of law, and offers a reconceptual. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 7 |a Law  |x Political aspects  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00993795 
650 7 |a Law  |x Philosophy  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00993788 
650 7 |a Law  |x Methodology  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00993777 
650 7 |a Judicial process  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00984705 
650 6 |a Droit  |x Aspect politique. 
650 6 |a Processus judiciaire. 
650 0 |a Law  |x Political aspects. 
650 0 |a Judicial process. 
650 0 |a Law  |x Methodology. 
650 0 |a Law  |x Philosophy. 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/71113/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 

Ejemplares similares