Cargando…

When Proliferation Causes Peace : The Psychology of Nuclear Crises /

Does the acquisitions of nuclear weapons by a state lead to peace and stability through deterrence, or does it lead to instability and dangerous crises? This is one of the great debates in international relations scholarship. Michael D. Cohen argues that nuclear weapons acquisition often does danger...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Cohen, Michael D., PhD (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Washington, DC : Georgetown University Press, [2017]
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_62539
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905050432.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 170210t20172017dcu o 00 0 eng d
010 |z  2017002309 
020 |a 9781626164963 
020 |z 9781626164956 
020 |z 9781626164949 
035 |a (OCoLC)973222792 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Cohen, Michael D.,  |c PhD,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a When Proliferation Causes Peace :   |b The Psychology of Nuclear Crises /   |c Michael D. Cohen. 
264 1 |a Washington, DC :  |b Georgetown University Press,  |c [2017] 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2018 
264 4 |c ©[2017] 
300 |a 1 online resource (301 pages):   |b illustrations ; 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
505 0 |a 1. Nuclear weapons: cause of conflict or principle of peace? -- 2. Fear and learning: psychology, nuclear crises, and foreign policy -- 3. Blind moles and mutual extermination: the Soviet Union, 1956-1962 -- 4. The most dangerous place in the world: Pakistan, 1998-2002 -- 5. I thought it was my last meal: Kennedy, Vajpayee, Nixon, and Mao -- 6. If you can get through this period : when proliferation causes peace. 
520 |a Does the acquisitions of nuclear weapons by a state lead to peace and stability through deterrence, or does it lead to instability and dangerous crises? This is one of the great debates in international relations scholarship. Michael D. Cohen argues that nuclear weapons acquisition often does dangerously embolden the acquiring state to undertake coercion and aggression behind their nuclear shield, but he says that this behavior moderates over time as particular leaders learn the dangers and limitations of nuclear coercion. The psychological impact of experiencing a nuclear crisis and then regaining control of the situation changes their behavior going forward. This book examines the historical cases of the Soviet Union and Pakistan in depth and also looks at mini-cases that involved the United States, China, and India to make this argument. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 7 |a Psychologie  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Atomkriegsgefahr  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Nuclear weapons  |x Government policy.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01040980 
650 7 |a Nuclear nonproliferation.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01040376 
650 7 |a Nuclear crisis control.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01039925 
650 7 |a International relations.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00977053 
650 7 |a international relations.  |2 aat 
650 6 |a Relations internationales. 
650 6 |a Non-proliferation nucleaire. 
650 6 |a Armes nucleaires  |x Politique gouvernementale. 
650 0 |a International relations. 
650 0 |a Nuclear nonproliferation. 
650 0 |a Nuclear weapons  |x Government policy. 
650 0 |a Nuclear crisis control. 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/62539/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2018 Complete 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2018 Psychology