The Fourth Amendement in Flux : The Roberts Court, Crime Crontrol, and Digital Privacy /

"When the Founders penned the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, it was not difficult to identify the "persons, houses, papers, and effects" they meant to protect; nor was it hard to understand what "unreasonable searches and seizures" were. The Fourth Amendment was inten...

Description complète

Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Gizzi, Michael C. (Auteur), Curtis, R. Craig (Auteur)
Format: Électronique eBook
Langue:Inglés
Publié: Lawrence, Kansas : University Press of Kansas, [2016]
Collection:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Sujets:
United States. > Supreme Court.
États-Unis. > Supreme Court.
Searches and seizures.
POLITICAL SCIENCE > Constitutions.
LAW > Constitutional.
Searches and seizures > United States > Cases.
United States.
Trials, litigation, etc.
Cases.
Electronic books.
Accès en ligne:Texto completo
Table des matières:
  • Explaining the Roberts court's Fourth Amendment jurisprudence
  • Setting the stage
  • The Burger court and the rise of a jurisprudence of crime control
  • The war on drugs and the triumph of the Rehnquist court
  • The Roberts court in flux
  • The jurisprudence of crime control on the Roberts court
  • Reining in the excesses of crime control
  • Toward the future.

Documents similaires