Cargando…

Congress : Protecting Individual Rights /

"When asked which branch of government protects citizens' rights, we tend to think of the Supreme Court--stepping in to defend gay rights, for example, in the recent same-sex marriage case. But as constitutional scholar Louis Fisher reveals in his new book, this would be a mistake--and not...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Fisher, Louis (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Lawrence, Kansas : University Press of Kansas, [2016]
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_44902
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905044710.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 151109s2016 ksu o 00 0 eng d
010 |z  2015043966 
020 |a 9780700622122 
020 |z 9780700622115 
035 |a (OCoLC)942841132 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Fisher, Louis,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Congress :   |b Protecting Individual Rights /   |c Louis Fisher. 
264 1 |a Lawrence, Kansas :  |b University Press of Kansas,  |c [2016] 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2016 
264 4 |c ©[2016] 
300 |a 1 online resource (216 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
505 0 |a Judging the three branches -- Founding principles -- The rights of blacks -- The rights of women -- The rights of children -- Protecting religious liberty -- The rights of Native Americans -- Strengthening U.S. democracy. 
520 |a "When asked which branch of government protects citizens' rights, we tend to think of the Supreme Court--stepping in to defend gay rights, for example, in the recent same-sex marriage case. But as constitutional scholar Louis Fisher reveals in his new book, this would be a mistake--and not just because a decision like the gay marriage ruling can be decided by the opinion of a single justice. Rather, we tend to judge the executive and judicial branches idealistically, while taking a more realistic view of the legislative, with its necessarily messier and more transparent workings. In Congress, Fisher highlights these biases as he measures the record of the three branches in protecting individual rights and finds that Congress, far more than the president or the Supreme Court, has defended the rights of blacks, women, children, Native Americans, and religious liberty. After reviewing the constitutional principles that apply to all three branches of government, Fisher conducts us through a history of struggles over individual rights, showing how the court has frequently failed at many critical junctures where Congress has acted to protect rights. He identifies changes in the balance of power over time--a post World War II transformation that has undermined the system of checks and balances the Framers designed to protect individuals in their aspiration for self-government. Without a strong, independent Congress, this book reminds us, our system would operate with two elected officers in the executive branch and none in the judiciary, a form of government best described as elitist--and one no one would deem democratic. In light of the history that unfolds here--and in view of a Congress widely decried as dysfunctional--Fisher proposes reforms that would strengthen not only the legislative branch's role in protecting individual rights under the Constitution, but also its standing in the democracy it serves."--Provided by publisher. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
610 1 7 |a USA  |b Congress  |2 gnd 
610 1 7 |a United States.  |b Congress.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00529490 
610 1 6 |a États-Unis.  |b Congress  |x Pouvoirs et fonctions. 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Congress  |x Powers and duties. 
650 7 |a History.  |2 pplt 
650 7 |a Civil and political rights.  |2 pplt 
650 7 |a Separation of powers.  |2 pplt 
650 7 |a Congress.  |2 pplt 
650 7 |a United States of America.  |2 pplt 
650 7 |a Minderheitenrecht  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Individualrecht  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Gewaltenteilung  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Bürgerrecht  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Separation of powers.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01112740 
650 7 |a Legislative power.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00995815 
650 7 |a Civil rights.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00862627 
650 7 |a Human rights.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00963285 
650 7 |a civil rights.  |2 aat 
650 6 |a Droits de l'homme (Droit international) 
650 6 |a Droits de l'homme. 
650 6 |a Separation des pouvoirs  |z États-Unis. 
650 6 |a Droits de l'homme  |z États-Unis  |x Histoire. 
650 1 2 |a Human Rights 
650 1 2 |a Government  |x history 
650 1 2 |a Civil Rights 
650 0 |a Human rights. 
650 0 |a Civil rights. 
650 0 |a Separation of powers  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Civil rights  |z United States  |x History. 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
655 7 |a History.  |2 lcgft 
655 7 |a History.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01411628 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/44902/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2016 Complete 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2016 Political Science and Policy Studies