Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy : The Presidency, the Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History /
Should the Supreme Court have the last word when it comes to interpreting the Constitution? The justices on the Supreme Court certainly seem to think so--and their critics say that this position threatens democracy. But Keith Whittington argues that the Court's justices have not simply seized p...
| Auteur principal: | Whittington, Keith E. |
|---|---|
| Format: | Électronique eBook |
| Langue: | Inglés |
| Publié: |
Princeton, N.J. :
Princeton University Press,
2007.
|
| Collection: | Book collections on Project MUSE.
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | Texto completo |
Documents similaires
-
Political foundations of judicial supremacy : the presidency, the Supreme Court, and constitutional leadership in U.S. history /
par: Whittington, Keith E.
Publié: (2007) -
Supremely partisan : how raw politics tips the scales in the United States Supreme Court /
par: Zirin, James D.
Publié: (2016) -
Reconsidering Judicial Finality : Why the Supreme Court Is Not the Last Word on the Constitution /
par: Fisher, Louis
Publié: (2019) -
Reconsidering judicial finality : why the Supreme Court is not the last word on the Constitution /
par: Fisher, Louis
Publié: (2019) -
The Constrained Court : Law, Politics, and the Decisions Justices Make /
par: Bailey, Michael A., 1969-
Publié: (2011)


