Subsidizing Democracy : How Public Funding Changes Elections and How It Can Work in the Future /

Afficher d'autres versions (2)

In the wake of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010), the case that allowed corporate and union spending in elections, many Americans despaired over the corrosive influence that private and often anonymous money can have on political platforms, campaigns, and outcomes at the federal...

Description complète

Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Miller, Michael Gerald (Auteur)
Format: Électronique eBook
Langue:Inglés
Publié: Ithaca : Cornell University Press, 2014.
Collection:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Sujets:
Politics and government
Political campaigns.
Elections.
Campaign funds.
HISTORY > United States > 20th Century.
POLITICAL SCIENCE > Political Process > General.
POLITICAL SCIENCE > Political Process > Elections.
Elections > United States.
Political campaigns > United States.
Campaign funds > United States.
United States.
États-Unis > Politique et gouvernement > 21e siecle.
United States > Politics and government > 21st century.
Electronic books.
Accès en ligne:Texto completo
Table des matières:
  • Why public funding?
  • Strategic candidates and public funding
  • Campaign time
  • Voting behavior
  • Candidate quality
  • Ideology and partisan participation
  • Clean elections at the Supreme Court
  • Conclusion : reform in the future.

Documents similaires