Cargando…

The Judicial Role in a Diverse Federation : Lessons from the Supreme Court of Canada /

"In The Judicial Role in a Diverse Federation, Robert Schertzer uses the example of the Supreme Court of Canada to examine how apex courts manage diversity and conflict in federal states. Schertzer argues that in a diverse federation where the nature of the federal system is contested the court...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Schertzer, Robert, 1981- (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: London : University of Toronto Press, 2016.
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_107316
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905054159.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 160420s2016 onc o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9781487510626 
020 |z 9781487510633 
020 |z 9781487500283 
035 |a (OCoLC)946999803 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Schertzer, Robert,  |d 1981-  |e author. 
245 1 4 |a The Judicial Role in a Diverse Federation :   |b Lessons from the Supreme Court of Canada /   |c Robert Schertzer. 
264 1 |a London :  |b University of Toronto Press,  |c 2016. 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2023 
264 4 |c ©2016. 
300 |a 1 online resource (352 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
505 0 |a The "problem" of national minorities and the "solution" of federalism -- The role of the federal arbiter in a diverse federation -- Investigating the SCC's federalism jurisprudence -- The exemplar of the Seccession Reference -- The SCC's imposing federalism jurisprudence -- A federalism jurisprudence of recognition. 
520 |a "In The Judicial Role in a Diverse Federation, Robert Schertzer uses the example of the Supreme Court of Canada to examine how apex courts manage diversity and conflict in federal states. Schertzer argues that in a diverse federation where the nature of the federal system is contested the courts should facilitate negotiation between conflicting parties, rather than impose their own vision of the federal system. Drawing on a comprehensive review of the Supreme Court federalism jurisprudence between 1980 and 2010, he demonstrates that the court has increasingly adopted this approach of facilitating negotiation by acknowledging the legitimacy of different understandings of the Canadian federation. This book will be required reading both for those interested in Canada's Supreme Court and for those engaged in broader debates about the use of federalism in multinational states."--  |c Provided by publisher 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
610 1 7 |a Canada.  |b Supreme Court.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00512507 
610 1 0 |a Canada.  |b Supreme Court. 
650 7 |a Federal government.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00922333 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Public.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Constitutional.  |2 bisacsh 
650 0 |a Federal government  |z Canada  |v Cases. 
651 7 |a Canada.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204310 
655 7 |a Trials, litigation, etc.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01423712 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/107316/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection