Why citizen participation succeeds or fails : a comparative analysis of participatory budgeting /
Matt Ryan draws on ten years of research to deliver this landmark comparative review of participatory budgeting, or collective decisions on spending and taxation around the world. With examples of both positive change and notable failure, the book shows when and why citizens achieve this, and how po...
Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
---|---|
Autor principal: | |
Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
Bristol, UK :
Bristol University Press,
2021.
|
Temas: | |
Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Front Cover
- Epigraph
- Why Citizen Participation Succeeds or Fails: A Comparative Analysis of Participatory Budgeting
- Copyright information
- Table of contents
- List of Figures and Tables
- List of abbreviations
- Acknowledgments
- Preface
- Part I
- 1 Understanding Participation as a Response to Democratic Deficits
- Democracy and participation
- Malaise and innovation
- Reform: when theories of democratic legitimacy meet the history of governing societies
- Participatory budgeting
- Why compare?
- Beyond techniques for policymaking and social science: wider significance
- Understanding democratic deepening
- 2 Participatory Budgeting: How Do We Understand Exceptional Democracy?
- The scholarship of participatory budgeting
- Starting from a single case: Porto Alegre, Brazil
- What made Porto Alegre exceptional?
- How comparison follows from a single case
- 3 From Exceptions to Cases of a Participatory Budgeting Phenomenon
- How variance in design as well as context explains outcomes
- comparison within Brazil
- More cases, larger-N comparisons
- What prospects for a middle way?
- Participatory budgeting and participatory budgeting research move outside Brazil
- Comparing participatory budgeting across cultures
- Towards a systematic cumulated comparison of participatory budgeting
- Part II
- 4 Comparing Participation Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis
- Why now for a cumulative qualitative comparison?
- What is qualitative comparative analysis?
- Necessity and sufficiency
- Combinatorial and asymmetric causation and explanation
- Intersection, union and negation
- Logical cases, remainders and truth tables
- Fuzzy sets, membership scores and calibration
- Consistency or inclusion, coverage, relevance and proportional reduction in inconsistency scores
- Applying qualitative comparative analysis to participatory budgeting
- Iterating between cases and theory to accumulate participatory budgeting knowledge
- The challenge of expanding the evidence base
- Differentiating PB from participatory grant-making processes: what PB is not
- Cases and data for a worldwide comparison
- 5 What Participatory Democrats Expect
- 'Success'
- Influencing conditions
- The set of government leaders committed to a participatory governing philosophy (pl)
- Bureaucratic support for participatory budgeting (bsp)
- Autonomous civil society demands for participatory budgeting projects (csd)
- Financial basis to spend (fbs)
- Why favour these conditions over others?
- A note on comparison and time
- Conceptualization and calibration: fuzzy logic meets participatory democracy
- A fuzzy set analysis of 30 cases
- To the analytic moments (with a return ticket)
- Part III
- 6 Necessary Conditions for Democratic Reform
- Tests for necessity
- Extending the analysis: bringing complexity back in