Cargando…

The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity Supreme Court Opinions, Public Arguments, and Affirmative Action /

"Despite the tepid reception of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke in 1978, the Supreme Court has thrice affirmed its holding: universities can use race as an admissions factor to achieve the goal of a diverse student body. This book examines the process of rhetorical invention fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Carr, M. Kelly (Autor)
Autor Corporativo: Project Muse
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: East Lansing : Michigan State University Press, 2018.
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Ma 4500
001 JSTOR_on1028954362
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||nn|n
008 170530s2018 miu o 000 0 eng d
010 |z  2017025951 
040 |a P@U  |b eng  |c P@U  |d YDX  |d EBLCP  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCO  |d IDB  |d MERUC  |d JSTOR  |d RCJ  |d OCLCA  |d N$T  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCA  |d OCLCQ  |d UKAHL  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO 
019 |a 1029208537  |a 1029244612  |a 1029321989  |a 1029448261  |a 1029495954 
020 |a 9781609175641  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 1609175646  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 9781628953312  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 1628953314  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 9781611862843 (pbk. : alk. paper) 
020 |z 9781628963311 (kindle) 
020 |z 1611862841 
020 |z 162896331X (kindle) 
029 1 |a CHVBK  |b 509402275 
029 1 |a CHNEW  |b 000987310 
035 |a (OCoLC)1028954362  |z (OCoLC)1029208537  |z (OCoLC)1029244612  |z (OCoLC)1029321989  |z (OCoLC)1029448261  |z (OCoLC)1029495954 
037 |a 22573/ctt21m32fg  |b JSTOR 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 0 0 |a KF8748  |b .C26 2018 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 013000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAN  |x 015000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAN  |x 000000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 347.73/26  |2 23 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Carr, M. Kelly,  |e author. 
245 1 4 |a The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity  |h [electronic resource] :  |b Supreme Court Opinions, Public Arguments, and Affirmative Action /  |c M. Kelly Carr. 
260 |a East Lansing :  |b Michigan State University Press,  |c 2018.  |e (Baltimore, Md. :  |f Project MUSE,  |g 2015) 
300 |a 1 online resource (pages cm.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Rhetoric and public affairs series 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
505 0 |a Intro; Contents; Acknowledgments; Introduction; 1. Collaborative Rhetorical Inventionin Supreme Court Opinions; 2. Amicus Briefs as Argumentative Scene in Bakke; 3. The Intrachambers Inventional Process and the Pragmatic Roots of Diversity; 4. Prudential Supreme Court Opinion Writing; 5. The Rhetorical Supreme Court and the Legacy of Diversity; Notes; Index 
520 |a "Despite the tepid reception of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke in 1978, the Supreme Court has thrice affirmed its holding: universities can use race as an admissions factor to achieve the goal of a diverse student body. This book examines the process of rhetorical invention followed by Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr., his colleagues, and other interlocutors as they sifted through arguments surrounding affirmative action policies to settle on diversity as affirmative action's best constitutional justification. Here M. Kelly Carr explores the goals, constraints, and argumentative tools of the various parties as they utilized the linguistic resources available to them, including arguments about race, merit, and the role of the public university in civic life. Using public address texts, legal briefs, memoranda, and draft opinions, Carr looks at how public arguments informed the amicus briefs, chambers memos, and legal principles before concluding that Powell's pragmatic decision making fused the principle of individualism with an appreciation of multiculturalism to accommodate his colleagues' differing opinions. She argues that Bakke is thus a legal and rhetorical milestone that helped to shift the justificatory grounds of race-conscious policy away from a recognition of historical discrimination and its call for reparative equality, and toward an appreciation of racial diversity." -- Publisher's website. 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Evidence Based Acquisitions 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA) 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court. 
610 1 6 |a États-Unis.  |b Supreme Court. 
610 1 7 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court  |2 fast 
650 0 |a Judicial process  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Judicial opinions  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Rhetoric  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Law  |z United States  |x Language. 
650 6 |a Processus judiciaire  |z États-Unis. 
650 6 |a Jugements  |z États-Unis. 
650 6 |a Rhétorique  |z États-Unis. 
650 6 |a Droit  |z États-Unis  |x Langage. 
650 7 |a LAW / Civil Rights  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Judicial opinions  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Judicial process  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Law  |x Language  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Rhetoric  |2 fast 
651 7 |a United States  |2 fast 
710 2 |a Project Muse. 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |z 9781611862843  |z 1611862841  |z 9781628953312  |z 1628953314  |z 9781628963311  |z 162896331X  |w (DLC) 2017025951  |w (OCoLC)988900596 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.14321/j.ctt21kk1fv  |z Texto completo 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH39852397 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 300584783 
938 |a Project MUSE  |b MUSE  |n muse67465 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 15224829 
938 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b EBLB  |n EBL5321191 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 2154029 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP