Cargando…
Judicial independence and the American constitution : a democratic paradox /
"The Framers of the American Constitution took special pains to ensure that the governing principles of the republic were insulated from the reach of simple majorities. Only super-majoritarian amendments could modify these fundamental constitutional dictates. The Framers established a judicial...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Stanford, California :
Stanford Law Books, an imprint of Stanford University Press,
[2017]
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000Ii 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | JSTOR_ocn961035142 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20231005004200.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr ||||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 161020s2017 cau ob 001 0 eng | ||
| 010 | |a 2016048546 | ||
| 040 | |a DLC |b eng |e rda |e pn |c DLC |d OCLCO |d OCLCF |d OCLCQ |d YDX |d EBLCP |d CLU |d N$T |d MERUC |d OCLCQ |d YDX |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d UAB |d N$T |d WRM |d N$T |d EZ9 |d IGB |d AUW |d BTN |d MHW |d INTCL |d SNK |d AU@ |d OCLCQ |d G3B |d S8I |d S8J |d STF |d D6H |d UKAHL |d OCLCQ |d JSTOR |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ | ||
| 019 | |a 1097124767 |a 1162191636 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780804792905 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 0804792909 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9781503601840 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 1503601846 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 029 | 1 | |a AU@ |b 000058878179 | |
| 029 | 1 | |a CHNEW |b 000961738 | |
| 029 | 1 | |a CHVBK |b 491703686 | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)961035142 |z (OCoLC)1097124767 |z (OCoLC)1162191636 | ||
| 037 | |a 22573/ctvqrpmjw |b JSTOR | ||
| 043 | |a n-us--- | ||
| 050 | 1 | 4 | |a KF5130 |b .R43 2017 |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 012000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 062000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a POL |x 040030 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 018000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 0 | 0 | |a 347.73/12 |2 23 |
| 049 | |a UAMI | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Redish, Martin H., |e author. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Judicial independence and the American constitution : |b a democratic paradox / |c Martin H. Redish. |
| 264 | 1 | |a Stanford, California : |b Stanford Law Books, an imprint of Stanford University Press, |c [2017] | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (260 pages) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Introduction : America's contribution to political thought : prophylactic judicial independence as an instrument of democratic constitutionalism -- The foundations of American constitutionalism -- A taxonomy of judicial independence -- Judicial impeachment, judicial discipline, and American constitutionalism -- State courts, due process and the dangers of popular constitutionalism -- Constitutionalism, democracy, and the pathology of legislative deception -- Habeas corpus, due process, and American constitutionalism. | |
| 588 | 0 | |a Online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on January 19, 2018). | |
| 520 | |a "The Framers of the American Constitution took special pains to ensure that the governing principles of the republic were insulated from the reach of simple majorities. Only super-majoritarian amendments could modify these fundamental constitutional dictates. The Framers established a judicial branch shielded from direct majoritarian political accountability to protect and enforce these constitutional limits. Paradoxically, only a counter-majoritarian judicial branch could ensure the continued vitality of our representational form of government. This important lesson of the paradox of American democracy has been challenged and often ignored by office holders and legal scholars. [This book] defends the centrality of these special protections of judicial independence. [The author] explains how the nation's system of counter-majoritarian constitutionalism cannot survive absent the vesting of final powers of constitutional interpretation and enforcement in the one branch of government expressly protected by the Constitution from direct political accountability: the judicial branch. He uncovers how the current framework of American constitutional law has been unwisely allowed to threaten or undermine these core precepts of judicial independence."--Back cover. | ||
| 590 | |a JSTOR |b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA) | ||
| 590 | |a JSTOR |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Judicial independence |z United States. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Judicial power |z United States. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Constitutional law |z United States. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Democracy |z United States. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Indépendance judiciaire |z États-Unis. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Pouvoir judiciaire |z États-Unis. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Civil Procedure. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Legal Services. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE |x Government |x Judicial Branch. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW |x Constitutional. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Constitutional law. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst00875797 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Democracy. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst00890077 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Judicial independence. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst00984681 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Judicial power. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst00984696 | |
| 651 | 7 | |a United States. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Redish, Martin H. |t Judicial independence and the American constitution : a democratic paradox. |d Stanford, California : Stanford University Press, ©2017 |h 260 pages |z 9780804792905 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.2307/j.ctvqsf012 |z Texto completo |
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH31956323 | ||
| 938 | |a ProQuest Ebook Central |b EBLB |n EBL4862140 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 1519276 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 14508541 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b IZTAP | ||