A systematic process to facilitate evidence-informed decisionmaking regarding program expansion /

Show other versions (5)

While the Department of Defense supports more than 200 psychological health and traumatic brain injury programs, it lacks an approach and process to systematically develop, track, and assess the performance of this portfolio of programs. Further, there is not yet a uniform approach to decisionmaking...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Call Number:Libro Electrónico
Main Authors: Martin, Laurie T. (Laurie Thayer), 1974- (Author), Farris, Coreen (Author), Adamson, David M. (Author), Weinick, Robin M. (Author)
Corporate Authors: United States. Department of Defense. Office of the Secretary of Defense (supporting body.), Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health & Traumatic Brain Injury (U.S.) (supporting body.)
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:Inglés
Published: Santa Monica, CA : Rand Corporation, [2014]
Series:RAND toolkit ; v. 3.
Research report (Rand Corporation) ; RR487z3.
Subjects:
Medical care > United States > Evaluation.
Mental health services > Evaluation.
Brain > Wounds and injuries > Treatment > Evaluation.
Health services administration > United States.
Evidence-based medicine > Handbooks, manuals, etc.
Mental health services.
Evidence-based medicine.
Health services administration.
Brain Injuries > rehabilitation
Military Personnel > psychology
Mental Health Services
Evidence-Based Medicine
Program Evaluation
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Evidence-Based Practice
Services de santé > Administration.
Médecine factuelle.
Services de santé mentale.
Cerveau > Lésions et blessures > Traitement > Évaluation.
Services de santé > Administration > États-Unis.
Médecine factuelle > Guides, manuels, etc.
PSYCHOLOGY > Psychopathology > Depression.
Mental health services
Evidence-based medicine
Health services administration
Medical care > Evaluation
Mental health services > Evaluation
United States
Handbooks and manuals
Online Access:Texto completo
Table of Contents:
  • Introduction
  • Assessing programs for possible expansion
  • Quality of evaluation
  • Program effectiveness
  • Population and policy priorities
  • Decisionmaking regarding program expansion
  • Appendix A: Program abstraction form
  • Appendix B: The RAND Program Expansion Tool and instruction manual
  • Appendix C: Instruction manual for the RAND program assessment tool.

Similar Items