An assessment of the civilian acquisition workforce personnel demonstration project /

Show other versions (1)

"The vast majority of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and federal civilian employees work on the General Schedule (GS) personnel system. However, some concerns have been raised about the GS system, including perceptions that poorly performing employees are tolerated for extended periods of tim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Call Number:Libro Electrónico
Corporate Authors: Rand Corporation, National Defense Research Institute (U.S.)
Other Authors: Werber, Laura
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:Inglés
Published: Santa Monica, Calif. : RAND, 2012.
Series:Technical report (Rand Corporation) ; TR-1286-OSD.
Subjects:
United States. > Department of Defense > Procurement > Management.
United States. > Department of Defense > Personnel management > Evaluation.
United States. > Department of Defense.
Human capital > Government policy > United States.
Civil service > United States > Personnel management.
Fonction publique > États-Unis > Personnel > Direction.
BUSINESS & ECONOMICS > Decision-Making & Problem Solving.
Armed Forces > Procurement > Management.
Civil service > Personnel management.
Human capital > Government policy.
Personnel management > Evaluation.
United States.
Online Access:Texto completo
Table of Contents:
  • Introduction
  • Assessment Criterion A: Workforce Description
  • Assessment Criterion B: Explanation of Appointment Flexibilities
  • Assessment Criterion C: Explanation of Performance Appraisal Flexibilities
  • Assessment Criterion D: Steps to Ensure Fairness and Transparency
  • Assessment Criterion E: How the Project Helps Organizations Better Meet Mission Needs
  • Assessment Criterion F: Application of Flexibilities and Barriers to Their Use
  • Assessment Criterion G: Process for Performance Appraisal Feedback
  • Assessment Criterion H: Impact on Career Progression
  • Assessment Criterion I: Appropriateness in Light of Complexities of the Workforce
  • Assessment Criterion J: Sufficient Protections for Diversity in Promotion and Retention
  • Assessment Criterion K: Adequacy of Training
  • Assessment Criterion L: Process for Ensuring Employee Involvement
  • Conclusions
  • Appendix A. Analysis of Survey Data
  • Appendix B.A Propensity Score Matching Exploration of AcqDemo's Impact on Retention and Compensation of Unionized Employees.

Similar Items