Cargando…

Is rational choice theory all of social science? /

Annotation Advocates of rational choice theory in political science have been perceived by their critics as attempting to establish an intellectual hegemony in contemporary social science, to the detriment of alternative methods of research. The debate has gained a nonacademic audience, hitting the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Lichbach, Mark Irving, 1951- (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Ann Arbor : The University of Michigan Press, [2003]
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
UPCC book collections on Project MUSE. Archive Political Science and Policy Studies Foundation.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 JSTOR_ocn587603662
003 OCoLC
005 20231005004200.0
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 020726s2003 miu ob 001 0 eng
010 |a  2020707026 
040 |a DLC  |b eng  |e rda  |c DLC  |d YDXCP  |d OCLCE  |d IDEBK  |d E7B  |d OCLCF  |d P@U  |d DKDLA  |d NLGGC  |d COO  |d JSTOR  |d AZK  |d COCUF  |d AGLDB  |d EZ9  |d IOG  |d U3W  |d STF  |d VNS  |d WRM  |d VTS  |d NRAMU  |d VT2  |d AU@  |d AUD  |d WYU  |d JBG  |d LVT  |d KNM  |d M8D  |d SFB  |d KIJ  |d UKCRE  |d U9X  |d UNOMP  |d MM9  |d N$T  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ 
019 |a 606988912  |a 647836225  |a 655710759  |a 764530466  |a 872100228  |a 961532065  |a 962599287  |a 975777879  |a 977689901  |a 978581069  |a 1018083547  |a 1037926224  |a 1038623187  |a 1044666033  |a 1045401732  |a 1047884598  |a 1055327522  |a 1058139511  |a 1060852805  |a 1065074783  |a 1081213938  |a 1082412825  |a 1097123922  |a 1117502663  |a 1119039087  |a 1119081499  |a 1121022524  |a 1126085593  |a 1136394350  |a 1148065544  |a 1153026413  |a 1156970600  |a 1164780112  |a 1178692728  |a 1183734696  |a 1194644136  |a 1198707968  |a 1223987561 
020 |a 9780472024858  |q ebook 
020 |a 047202485X  |q ebook 
020 |z 9780472068197  |q paper ;  |q alk. paper 
020 |z 0472068199  |q paper ;  |q alk. paper 
020 |z 9780472098194  |q cloth ;  |q alk. paper 
020 |z 0472098195  |q cloth ;  |q alk. paper 
020 |a 0472068199 
020 |a 9780472068197 
024 3 |a 9780472068197 
024 7 |a 10.3998/mpub.11998 
029 1 |a NZ1  |b 13862557 
029 1 |a GBVCP  |b 80310491X 
029 1 |a GBVCP  |b 1003618901 
029 1 |a DEBSZ  |b 421896205 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV043091219 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000051374791 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000050965852 
035 |a (OCoLC)587603662  |z (OCoLC)606988912  |z (OCoLC)647836225  |z (OCoLC)655710759  |z (OCoLC)764530466  |z (OCoLC)872100228  |z (OCoLC)961532065  |z (OCoLC)962599287  |z (OCoLC)975777879  |z (OCoLC)977689901  |z (OCoLC)978581069  |z (OCoLC)1018083547  |z (OCoLC)1037926224  |z (OCoLC)1038623187  |z (OCoLC)1044666033  |z (OCoLC)1045401732  |z (OCoLC)1047884598  |z (OCoLC)1055327522  |z (OCoLC)1058139511  |z (OCoLC)1060852805  |z (OCoLC)1065074783  |z (OCoLC)1081213938  |z (OCoLC)1082412825  |z (OCoLC)1097123922  |z (OCoLC)1117502663  |z (OCoLC)1119039087  |z (OCoLC)1119081499  |z (OCoLC)1121022524  |z (OCoLC)1126085593  |z (OCoLC)1136394350  |z (OCoLC)1148065544  |z (OCoLC)1153026413  |z (OCoLC)1156970600  |z (OCoLC)1164780112  |z (OCoLC)1178692728  |z (OCoLC)1183734696  |z (OCoLC)1194644136  |z (OCoLC)1198707968  |z (OCoLC)1223987561 
037 |a 22573/ctt1djbfwn  |b JSTOR 
042 |a pcc  |a dlr 
050 0 0 |a HM495 
072 7 |a SOC  |x 053000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a SOC  |x 002000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a POL000000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 0 |a 301/.01  |2 21 
084 |a 70.02  |2 bcl 
084 |a 89.03  |2 bcl 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Lichbach, Mark Irving,  |d 1951-  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Is rational choice theory all of social science? /  |c Mark I. Lichbach. 
264 1 |a Ann Arbor :  |b The University of Michigan Press,  |c [2003] 
300 |a 1 online resource 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 281-311) and index. 
588 |a Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher. 
505 0 |a Intro -- Contents -- Preface -- Acknowledgments -- Part I. Foils and Stories -- 1. Three Approaches to Foils -- 1.1. Rational Choice Theory and Its Foils -- 1.2. Social Scientific Theories and Their Foils -- 1.3. Foils in the Academy -- 1.4. My Hope for This Book -- 2. Three Types of Stories -- 2.1. Deep Stories -- 2.2. Exemplar Theorists -- 2.3. Ideal Types -- 2.4. The Rational Reconstruction of Research Programs -- 2.5. The Trouble with Stories: Thin and Thick Research Communities -- 2.6. Typologies and Genealogies -- Part II. The Rationalist Challenge -- 3. Rational/Social Choice Theory -- 3.1. Thin and Thick Rationalists -- 3.2. Rationalist Ontology -- 3.3. Rationalist Methodology -- 4. Rationalism and Hegemony -- 4.1. Why Rationalist Social Science Tends toward Hegemony -- 4.2. The Result: Theoretical Synthesis and Empirical Conciliation -- 4.3. Countertendencies: How Rationalist Social Science Defines Its Baselines and Boundaries -- 4.4. Countertendencies: Why Rationalist Social Science Lowers Its Positivistic Pretensions -- 4.5. Modest Rational Choice Theory -- Part III. The Alternatives to Rationalist Hegemony -- 5. Cultural/Interpretive Theory -- 5.1. Thin and Thick Culturalists -- 5.2. Culturalist Ontology -- 5.3. Culturalist Methodology -- 5.4. Culturalist Lacunae -- 6. Structural/Institutional Theory -- 6.1. Thin and Thick Structuralists -- 6.2. Structuralist Ontology -- 6.3. Structuralist Methodology -- 6.4. Structuralist Lacunae -- Part IV. The Debate about the Debate -- 7. The Need for Synthesis: Structure and Action -- 7.1. For Synthesis -- 7.2. Types of Syntheses -- 7.3. Structure/Institution and Action/Process -- 7.4. Methodological Synthesis: The Causal and the Interpretive -- 7.5. The Importance of Synthesis -- 8. The Need for Analysis: Models and Foils -- 8.1. For Models and Foils -- 8.2. Against Synthesis. 
505 8 |a 8.3. Conclusion: Synthesis and Analysis -- Part V. The Philosophy of Science -- 9. The General and the Particular -- 9.1. The Research Programs -- 9.2. Weber's Approach -- 9.3. The General and the Particular in the Social Sciences -- 10. Models and Foils: A Modest Philosophy of Science for Social Science -- 10.1. Theory -- 10.2. Evidence -- 10.3. Theory and Evidence -- 10.4. Evaluation -- 10.5. How a Modest Rationalist Evaluates Theory and Evidence -- Notes -- References -- Index. 
506 |3 Use copy  |f Restrictions unspecified  |2 star  |5 MiAaHDL 
520 8 |a Annotation Advocates of rational choice theory in political science have been perceived by their critics as attempting to establish an intellectual hegemony in contemporary social science, to the detriment of alternative methods of research. The debate has gained a nonacademic audience, hitting the pages of the New York Times and the New Republic. In the academy, the antagonists have expressed their views in books, journal articles, and at professional conferences. Mark I. Lichbach addresses the question of the place of rational choice theory in the social sciences in general and in political science in particular. He presents a typology of the antagonists as either rationalist, culturalist, or structuralist and offers an insightful examination of the debate. He reveals that the rationalist bid for hegemony and synthesis is rooted in the weaknesses, not the strengths, of rationalist thought. He concludes that the various theoretical camps are unlikely to accept the claimed superiority of the rationalist approach but that this opposition is of value in itself to the social sciences, which requires multiple perspectives to remain healthy. With its penetrating examination of the assumptions and basic arguments of each of the sides to this debate, this book cuts through the partisan rhetoric and provides an essential roadmap for the future of the discipline. Mark I. Lichbach is Professor of Government and Politics, University of Maryland. 
533 |a Electronic reproduction.  |b [Place of publication not identified] :  |c HathiTrust Digital Library,  |d 2010.  |5 MiAaHDL 
538 |a Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002.  |u http://purl.oclc.org/DLF/benchrepro0212  |5 MiAaHDL 
583 1 |a digitized  |c 2010  |h HathiTrust Digital Library  |l committed to preserve  |2 pda  |5 MiAaHDL 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA) 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Evidence Based Acquisitions 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR All Purchased 
650 0 |a Rational choice theory. 
650 6 |a Théorie des choix rationnels. 
650 7 |a SOCIAL SCIENCE  |x Regional Studies.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a SOCIAL SCIENCE  |x Anthropology  |x General.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x General.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Rational choice theory.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01090260 
650 1 7 |a Rationele keuze.  |2 gtt 
650 1 7 |a Social choice.  |2 gtt 
650 1 7 |a Politieke wetenschappen.  |2 gtt 
650 1 7 |a Sociale wetenschappen.  |2 gtt 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Mark I. Lichbach.  |t Is rational choice theory all of social science?  |d Ann Arbor : The University of Michigan Press, c2003.  |z 0472098195 (Cloth : alk. paper)  |w (DLC) 2002011937 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
830 0 |a UPCC book collections on Project MUSE.  |p Archive Political Science and Policy Studies Foundation. 
856 4 0 |u https://jstor.uam.elogim.com/stable/10.3998/mpub.11998  |z Texto completo 
891 |a .o11853141 
938 |a University of Michigan press  |b UOMP  |n 10.3998/mpub.11998 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 3155575 
938 |a Project MUSE  |b MUSE  |n muse8532 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 310054 
938 |a ebrary  |b EBRY  |n ebr10356834 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP