Cargando…
Distance learning ... for educators, trainers, and leaders. Volume 15, number 3, 2018 /
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor Corporativo: | |
| Otros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Charlotte, NC :
Information Age Publishing,
[2018]
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Front Cover; Featured Articles; 1; On-Campus Students' Perception of Distance Learning; 19; Wearable Learning Environments; 29; Insights From a Reflective Conversation Among Two Professors and a Student: Instructional Approaches, Accountability, and Building Community in Online Courses; 41; Quality Matters: The Implementation of a Quality Assurance Program for a Virtual Campus at a State College in Florida; 51; Google Classroom for the Online Classroom: An Assessment; 57; A Comprehensive Model for Evaluating E-learning Systems Success; Columns; Your Advertisement or Announcement Could Be Here
- USDLA 76 Canal Street, Suite 301 Boston, MA 02114 617-399-1770On-Campus Students' Perception of Distance Learning; Ezra Kiprono Maritim; Introduction; ODL Development in Education in Kenya; Phase 1: Combined Correspondence and Print-Based Era (1960s-1970s); Phase 2: Combined Radio and Print Material era (Late 1960s-1980s); Phase 3: Combined print and e-learning era (1990s-to-date); ODL and E-Learning Challenges and Emerging Prospects; E-Readiness Challenges; ODL Policy and Quality Assurance Challenges; Emerging E-Learning Prospects; The Problem
- 1. "We do not want to migrate to e-learning because we want to interact with the lecturers and hence students are saying no to e-learning.2. In the current trimester system, we complete our 4-year degree programs in 2 and half years."; Methodology; Subjects; Procedure; Results and Discussion; Profile of the Subjects; E-readiness; ODL Awareness; Use of Library E-Resources; Counterchecking Quality of Lecture Notes; Future Learning Preferences and Reflections; Preferred Future Study Mode; 1. Pure e-learning is inconvenient to some students, but blended mode is more convenient to all.
- 2. E-learning component is available anytime (24 hours).3. Less expensive in terms of fees, accommodation and travel cost.; 4. The two methods combined supplement one another:; 5. E-learning makes learning enjoyable and gives up-to-date information.; 6. Gives a chance to those involved elsewhere and wish to further their studies.; 7. Good for those from some parts of the country without Internet connectivity.
- 8. E-learning is more efficient for postgraduate studies while the traditional learning is more convenient for undergraduate studies. That is, e-learning is for mature learners who know what they want. 9. Traditional mode alone is time consuming. Traditional mode alone is slow and wasteful.; 10. E-learning enhances acquisition of technological skills.; 11. Efficiency in time saving with respect to coverage of the content and on resources.; 12. E-learning component is placeless and timeless/time-friendly learning.; 13. Accountable with respect to tracking learners learning progress.