Alternative dispute resolution of shareholder disputes in Hong Kong : institutionalizing its effective use /

Uses an interdisciplinary and empirical approach to analyze the process of institutionalizing alternative dispute resolution for shareholder disputes in Hong Kong.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Mak, Ida Kwan Lun (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Temas:
Dispute resolution (Law) > China > Hong Kong.
Stockholders > China > Hong Kong.
Règlement de conflits > Chine > Hongkong.
LAW > Civil Procedure.
LAW > Legal Services.
POLITICAL SCIENCE > Government > Judicial Branch.
Dispute resolution (Law)
Stockholders
China > Hong Kong
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Cover
  • Half-title
  • Title page
  • Copyright information
  • Dedication
  • Table of contents
  • List of figures
  • List of tables
  • Foreword
  • Acknowledgements
  • Part I Introduction, Overview and Methodology
  • 1 Introduction
  • 1.1 Resolution of Shareholder Disputes in a Small Private Company
  • 1.2 Arguments Development: Institutionalizing and Legitimizing ADR Policy in Shareholder Disputes
  • 1.3 Organization of the Book
  • 2 Development and Growth of ADR for Shareholder Disputes in Hong Kong
  • 2.1 Introduction
  • 2.2 Development of ADR in Hong Kong2.3 The Growth of ADR in Shareholder Disputes
  • 2.3.1 Government Policy Promoting the Use of ADR
  • 2.3.2 Judicial Support for Early and Informal Resolution of Shareholder Disputes
  • Practice Direction 3.1: The Use of Expert Determination on Valuation of Shares at the Stage of Petition
  • Practice Direction 3.3: Voluntary Use of Mediation and Other Alternative Processes for Unfair Prejudice Petition
  • 2.3.3 The Reform of Section 168A of the Companies Ordinance to Increase the Use of ADR
  • 2.4 Conclusion
  • 3 Key Methodology and Methods for Evaluation of Policy Development on ADR in Shareholder Disputes3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Methodology Development for Evaluation of Policy Development on ADR in Shareholder Disputes
  • 3.2.1 Focus of Research: Institutionalizing and Legitimizing of ADR
  • 3.2.2 Using Realistic Evaluation Methodology to Understand the Process ...
  • Conditions for the Development of ADR Methods for Shareholder Disputes in Hong Kong
  • Establishing Appropriate Mechanisms to Improve the Understanding and Awareness of ADR
  • Outcome Patterns of the Acceptance of Using ADR to Resolve Shareholder Disputes3.2.3 The Acceptance of Mixed Research Methods for Conducting a Realistic Evaluation
  • 3.3 Key Research Methods Used in This Book
  • 3.3.1 Doctrinal Approach to the Study of Law
  • 3.3.2 Comparative Approaches in the Study of Law
  • 3.3.3 Empirical Legal Research on Lawyersâ#x80;#x99; Attitudes Towards the Use of ADR for Shareholder Disputes ...
  • Unit of Analysis and the Sampling Frame
  • Mode of Sampling Processes
  • Mode of Data Collection
  • Measuring Hong Kong Lawyersâ#x80;#x99; Attitudes Towards the Use of ADRDeveloping Analytical Techniques to Evaluate the Attitudes of Hong Kong Lawyers Towards ...
  • 3.4 Conclusion
  • Part II Institutionalizing and Legitimizing ADR Policy in Shareholder ...
  • 4 The Role of the Court
  • 4.1 Introduction
  • 4.2 Policy Objectives of a Court-Connected ADR Programme for Shareholder Disputes
  • 4.3 Legitimizing a Judiciary ADR Programme for Shareholder Disputes ...
  • 4.4 Evaluating ADR Policy for Shareholder Disputes in Hong Kong: Judicial Acceptance

Ejemplares similares