Cargando…

Pejoration /

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Otros Autores: Finkbeiner, Rita, Meibauer, Jörg, Wiese, Heike
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Amsterdam ; Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company, [2016]
Colección:Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 228
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Intro
  • Pejoration
  • Editorial page
  • Title page
  • LCC data
  • Table of contents
  • Preface
  • What is pejoration, and how can it be expressed in language?
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Pejoration in grammar
  • 2.1 Prosody
  • 2.2 Word-formation
  • 2.3 Syntax
  • 2.4 Lexicon
  • 2.5 Semantics
  • 3. Pejoration in pragmatics
  • 3.1 Speech acts
  • 3.2 Implicatures
  • 3.2.1 Conventional-implicature approach
  • 3.2.2 Conversational implicatures
  • 3.3 Deixis
  • 3.4 Text and discourse
  • 4. Further dimensions of pejoration
  • References
  • Part I: Pejoration in different linguistic domains
  • Pejorative prosody
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Prosodic features
  • 2.1 Fundamental frequency and pitch
  • 2.2 Contour of the fundamental frequency in utterances
  • Intonation contour
  • 2.3 Speech rate and duration
  • 2.4 Stress
  • 3. Research on attitudes
  • 4. Planning and implementation of an experiment to compare positive with pejorative evaluative speaking styles
  • 4.1 Text material
  • 4.2 Speakers
  • 4.3 Voice recordings
  • 4.4 Perception tests
  • 5. Results of perception tests
  • 5.1 Auditory analysis of positive evaluations
  • 5.2 Auditory analysis of negative evaluations
  • 6. Acoustic analyses
  • 6.1 Distribution of fundamental frequency
  • 6.2 Mean fundamental frequency, standard deviation and range
  • 6.3 Characteristics of the fundamental frequency contours
  • 6.4 Graphical representation of the fundamental frequency contours
  • 6.5 Steepness of contours
  • 6.6 Realization of stress
  • 6.7 Analysis of duration and speech rate
  • 7. Conclusions
  • References
  • How do evaluative derivational meanings arise? A bit of Geforsche and Forscherei
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Are Ge-e and -(er)ei pejorative derivation patterns?
  • 3. Diachronic corpus analysis
  • 3.1 Aims and method
  • 3.2 The corpora
  • 3.3 Bases and contexts
  • 3.4 Findings.
  • 4. Discussion: How conventionalized is the pejorative derivational meaning?
  • 5. Outlook
  • References
  • Quantification with pejoratives
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Pejoratives and use-conditional meaning
  • 3. The semantics of pejoratives
  • 4. L∗CI
  • LCI and its extensions
  • 4.1 Composition in LCI
  • 4.2 Compositionality
  • 4.3 Denotations
  • 5. Quantificational problems with pejoratives
  • 6. Compositional multidimensionality
  • 6.1 Lexical extensions
  • 6.2 Cross-dimensional quantification
  • 7. Conclusion
  • References
  • Pejoration, normalcy conceptions and generic sentences
  • 1. Introduction: Examples for pejoration with generic sentences
  • 2. Normalcy conceptions
  • 2.1 Propositional expression of normality
  • 2.2 Properties of Normalcy Conceptions
  • 3. Generic sentences
  • 3.1 What is the connection between normalcy conceptions and generic sentences?
  • 4. What properties of generic sentences as expressions of NC make them suitable for pejorations?
  • 5. Conclusion
  • References
  • Demonstrative pejoratives
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. German demonstratives: State of the art
  • 2.1 Demonstrative paradigms in German
  • 2.2 Re-direction of attention and affectivity as demonstrativity functions
  • 3. What is pejoration?
  • 4. Cognitive proximity
  • 5. Demonstratives and pejoration revisited
  • 5.1 German proximal demonstrative dies- and pejoration
  • 5.2 German distal jen- and 'cognitive distance'
  • 6. Summing up
  • References
  • Part II: Pejoration, slurring and sarcasm
  • Slurring as insulting
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Slurs as illocutionary indicators
  • 2.1 Illocutionary indicator
  • 2.2 Stereotypical meaning of slurs
  • 2.3 On the force of illocutionary indicators
  • 3. Slurring as insulting
  • 3.1 Slurring as a speech act
  • 3.2 Slurring as insulting
  • 3.3 Non-derogatory uses explained
  • 4. A critique of the multi-act approach.
  • 4.1 Two propositions
  • two speech acts?
  • 4.2 Dominance of illocutionary indicators
  • 4.3 Indirect insulting
  • 5. Conclusions
  • References
  • A multi-act perspective on slurs
  • 1. The semantic status of derogatory content
  • 2. Criticisms to the notion of conventional implicature
  • 3. From multi-propositions to multi-acts
  • 4. Formalization
  • 5. Other kinds of pejoratives
  • 6. Conclusion
  • References
  • The meaning and use of slurs
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Contexts of use
  • 3. Target Group vs. In-Group
  • 4. The Semantics of Slur Terms
  • 5. Degree of Offensiveness
  • 6. Semantic change
  • 7. Conclusion
  • References
  • Pejoration via sarcastic irony and sarcasm
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Pejorative power of irony
  • 2.1 Boosting or minimising negative evaluation via irony
  • 3. Defining irony
  • 4. Irony vs. sarcasm
  • 4.1 Sarcasm
  • 5. Sarcastic irony
  • 6. Conclusions
  • References
  • Part III: Pejoration in different linguistic contexts
  • Pejoration in contact
  • 1. Introduction: Pejoration and structural borrowing
  • 2. Pejoration through m-reduplication
  • 2.1 A possible source: Turkish m-reduplication
  • 2.2 Similar developments in American English from a Yiddish source
  • 2.3 Support from existing patterns in German
  • 2.4 m-reduplication in urban German
  • 2.5 Pejoration, amplification, 'coolness', and fun: From echo word formation to pejoration
  • 3. Depejoration through "Scherz/Spaß" 'just kidding'
  • 3.1 "Scherz/Spaß" and "şaka" in German and Turkish
  • 3.2 Depejoration and joking: Words said in jest
  • 4. Conclusion: Developmental paths and constructional pejoration
  • References
  • Bla, bla, bla in German. A pejorative construction?
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Main usages of bla, bla, bla
  • 2.1 Dummy element usage
  • 2.2 List extender usage
  • 2.3 Dummy utterance usage
  • 2.4 Utterance list extender usage.
  • 2.5 Turn-initial reply usage
  • 3. Characteristic features of bla, bla, bla
  • 3.1 Syntactic features
  • 3.2 Phonological features
  • 3.3 Lexical-semantic features
  • 4. Bla, bla, bla as a meta-linguistic device
  • 5. Interim results
  • 6. Pejoration
  • coded or inferential?
  • 6. Summary
  • References
  • Pejoratives in Korean
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Preliminaries
  • 3. Typology and development of pejoratives
  • 3.1 Peripherality
  • 3.2 Insignificance
  • 3.3 Lack of sophistication
  • 3.4 Undesirable events/postures
  • 3.5 Feigned repetition
  • 3.6 Lack of specification
  • 4. Discussion
  • 4.1 Conceptual Motivation
  • 4.1.1 Devaluation attached to periphery
  • 4.1.2 Devaluation attached to small-size and non-humans
  • 4.1.3 Devaluation attached to lack of sophistication
  • 4.1.4 Devaluation attached to certain events and postures
  • 4.1.5 Devaluation attached to repetition
  • 4.1.6 Devaluation attached to lack of noteworthiness
  • 4.2 Cultural Motivation
  • 4.3 Subjectification and intersubjectification
  • 5. Summary and conclusion
  • References
  • Pejorative aspects attributed to hearing people in signed constructed dialogue
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Constructed dialogue in German Sign Language (GSL)
  • 3. Typification as "hearing" through CD
  • 4. Signed data analyses
  • 5. Digression A: Wolf and Hare (and Hedgehog)
  • 6. "The hearing" in pejorative CDs
  • 7. Digression B: "The deaf who conforms"
  • 8. Conclusion
  • References
  • Index.