The UK and European human rights : a strained relationship? /

"The UK's engagement with the legal protection of human rights at a European level has been, at varying stages, pioneering, sceptical and antagonistic. The UK government, media and public opinion have all at times expressed concerns about the growing influence of European human rights law,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Otros Autores: Ziegler, Katja S. (Editor ), Wicks, Elizabeth (Editor ), Hodson, Loveday (Editor )
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Oxford : Hart Publishing, 2015.
Colección:Modern studies in European law.
Temas:
Schuetz, Alb.
Europa
Human rights > Europe.
Human rights > Great Britain.
Droits de l'homme (Droit international) > Europe.
Droits de l'homme (Droit international) > Grande-Bretagne.
Human rights & civil liberties law.
LAW > International.
Human rights.
Menschenrecht
Internationales Recht
Europe.
Great Britain.
Groḃritannien
Conference papers and proceedings.
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Cover
  • Half-title
  • Title
  • Copyright
  • Foreword
  • Contents
  • List of Contributors
  • Introduction
  • 1. The UK and European Human Rights: A Strained Relationship?
  • I. THE COMPLEXITY OF THE?STRAINED? RELATIONSHIP
  • II. WHY THE?STRAIN??
  • III. RELIEVING THE STRAIN: UNTANGLE?OR DIVIDE ET IMPERA?
  • IV. OVERVIEW
  • Part I: Compliance, Cooperation or Clash? The Relationship Between the UK and the ECHR/Strasbourg Court
  • 2. The Relationship Between the Strasbourg Court and the National Courts?As Seen from Strasbourg
  • I. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS
  • II. JUDICIAL DIALOGUE OR EXCHANGE THROUGH JUDGMENTS DELIVERED IN GIVEN CASESIII. JUDICIAL DIALOGUE THROUGH INFORMAL MEETINGS
  • IV. JUDICIAL DIALOGUE THROUGH ADVISORY OPINIONS: PROTOCOL NO 16
  • V. CONCLUDING REMARKS
  • 3. The Relationship Between the Strasbourg Court and the National Courts?As Seen from the UK Supreme Court
  • I. DIALOGUE
  • II. THE EFFECT OF STRASBOURG JUDGMENTS IN DOMESTIC LAW
  • 4. The UK and Strasbourg: A Strained Relationship?The Long View
  • I. INTRODUCTION
  • II. 1950?79: THE DRAFTING AND SUBSEQUENT EVOLUTION OF THE ECHR
  • III. 1980?98: KEEPING THE EUROPEAN BILL OF RIGHTSIN STRASBOURG AND THEN BRINGING IT?HOME?IV. 2009?15 (OVERVIEW):?UNFINISHED BUSINESS??
  • V. UK?STRASBOURG RELATIONS UNDER THE HRA: A NEW EQUILIBRIUM ALREADY REACHED?
  • VI. CONCLUSIONS
  • 5. Reforming the European Court of Human Rights: The Impacts of Protocols 15 and 16 to the ECHR
  • I. INTRODUCTION
  • II. THE BRIGHTON DECLARATION: NEGOTIATING REFORM IN A TENSE CLIMATE
  • III. PROTOCOL 15: TOWARDS AN?AGE OF SUBSIDIARITY??
  • IV. PROTOCOL 16: THE?PROTOCOL OF DIALOGUE??
  • V. CONCLUDING REMARKS
  • 6. Should the English Courts under the HRA Mirror the Strasbourg Case Law?I. INTRODUCTION
  • II. THE OBLIGATION TO APPLY STRASBOURG CASE LAW UNDER THE HRA AND ITS LEGISLATIVE HISTORY
  • III. THE FORMULATION OF A MIRROR PRINCIPLE
  • IV. THE MIRROR PRINCIPLE IN PRACTICE
  • V. THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE MIRROR PRINCIPLE
  • VI. THE DECISION IN KENNEDY AND THE INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 10 ECHR
  • VII. THE CURRENT APPROACH TO THE MIRROR PRINCIPLE
  • VIII. CONCLUSION
  • 7. Repeal the HRA and Rely on the Common Law?
  • I. CONTEMPLATING REPEAL OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT
  • II. HUMAN RIGHTS AT COMMON LAW PRIOR TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIII. WHAT WOULD BE LOST IF THE HRA WERE REPEALED?
  • IV. THE SIDELINING OF THE COMMON LAW?S APPROACH TO HUMAN RIGHTS
  • V. THE OCCASIONAL RE-EMERGENCE OF THE COMMON LAW?S APPROACH TO HUMAN RIGHTS
  • VI. CONCLUSION
  • 8. The Implementation of European Court of Human RightsJudgments Against the UK: Unravelling the Paradox
  • I. INTRODUCTION
  • II. THE PARADOX OF THE UK?S RELATIONSHIP WITH THE ECTHR
  • III. MECHANISMS FOR IMPLEMENTING EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS JUDGMENTS IN THE UK

Ejemplares similares