Implied consent and sexual assault : intimate relationships, autonomy, and voice /

Afficher d'autres versions (1)

"In R. v. Ewanchuk, the Supreme Court of Canada held that sexual touching must be accompanied by express, contemporaneous consent. In doing so, the Court rejected the idea that sexual consent could be 'implied'. Ewanchuk was a landmark ruling, reflecting a powerful commitment to women...

Description complète

Détails bibliographiques
Cote:Libro Electrónico
Auteur principal: Plaxton, Michael, 1975- (Auteur)
Format: Électronique eBook
Langue:Inglés
Publié: Montreal ; Kingston : McGill-Queen's University Press, 2015.
Sujets:
Sexual consent > Canada.
Rape > Law and legislation > Canada.
Sex crimes > Law and legislation > Canada.
Women > Legal status, laws, etc. > Canada.
Man-woman relationships > Canada.
Consentement sexuel > Canada.
Viol > Droit > Législation > Canada.
Crimes sexuels > Droit > Législation > Canada.
Femmes > Droit > Canada.
Relations entre hommes et femmes > Canada.
LAW > Criminal Law > General.
Man-woman relationships
Rape > Law and legislation
Sex crimes > Law and legislation
Sexual consent
Women > Legal status, laws, etc.
Sexualbrott > juridik och lagstiftning.
Våldtäkt > juridik och lagstiftning.
Canada
Electronic books.
Accès en ligne:Texto completo
Table des matières:
  • Criminal law's expressive function
  • Wrong of sexual assault
  • Implied consent and Ewanchuk
  • Autonomy and section 273.1(1)
  • Mutuality and sexual instrumentalization
  • Exit, voice, and mutuality
  • What is stereotyping?
  • Context and the marital rape exception
  • Value of assurance
  • Overbreadth or bust?
  • Concluding thoughts: Voice and implied consent.

Documents similaires