Cargando…

Argumentation in political deliberation /

Dialectical approaches traditionally conceptualize argumentation as a discussion in which two parties debate on "two sides of an issue" (pro and con). However, many political issues engender multiple positions. This is clear in multi-party online deliberations in which often an array of co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Otros Autores: Lewinski, Marcin (Editor ), Mohammed, Dima (Editor )
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Amsterdam, Netherlands ; Philadelphia, PA : John Benjamins Publishing Company, [2015]
Colección:Benjamins current topics, 1874-0081 ; 76.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 EBSCO_ocn907931390
003 OCoLC
005 20231017213018.0
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 150421s2015 ne ob 001 0 eng
010 |a  2015016094 
040 |a DLC  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c DLC  |d N$T  |d EBLCP  |d YDXCP  |d IDEBK  |d CDX  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCQ  |d JBG  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCA  |d CEF  |d AU@  |d U3W  |d UKAHL  |d OCLCQ  |d UKSSU  |d OCLCQ  |d QGK 
019 |a 1259092040 
020 |a 9789027268273  |q (pdf) 
020 |a 9027268274  |q (pdf) 
020 |z 9789027242648  |q (hb ;  |q alk. paper) 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000054710993 
029 1 |a GBVCP  |b 829790330 
035 |a (OCoLC)907931390  |z (OCoLC)1259092040 
042 |a pcc 
050 0 0 |a P301.5.P47 
072 7 |a POL  |x 032000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a POL  |x 040000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a POL  |x 030000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a POL  |x 018000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 0 |a 320.01/41  |2 23 
049 |a UAMI 
245 0 0 |a Argumentation in political deliberation /  |c edited by Marcin Lewinski ; Dima Mohammed, Universidade Nova de Lisboa. 
264 1 |a Amsterdam, Netherlands ;  |a Philadelphia, PA :  |b John Benjamins Publishing Company,  |c [2015] 
300 |a 1 online resource 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Benjamins current topics, 1874-0081 ;  |v 76 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
588 0 |a Print version record and CIP data provided by publisher. 
505 0 |a Argumentation in Political Deliberation; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Argumentation in political deliberation; 1. Argumentation theory and political deliberation; 2. Overview of the volume; Acknowledgements; References; Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse in political deliberation; 1. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse; 2. Conventionalization of communicative practices in communicative activity types; 3. Institutional constraints on strategic maneuvering; 4. Pragma-dialectical research of argumentative discourse in the political domain. 
505 8 |a The place of counter discourse in two methods of public deliberation1. Introduction; 2. Two methods of public deliberation; 2.1 Consensus conference; French consensus conference on nanotechnology; 2.2 Public hearing; The public hearing on nanotechnology; 2.3 Public participation vs. public communication types of deliberation; 3. Defining public deliberation within argumentation studies; 4. Counter discourse in the two methods of public deliberation; 4.1 Counter discourse in the consensus conference; 4.2 Counter discourse in the public hearing; 5. Concluding remarks; Acknowledgements. 
505 8 |a 3. Political online forums as argumentative communities4. Research design; The online forum Climategate.nl; Data selection; Method of analysis; 5. Analysis; Fragment A: 8-12 December 2009; Fragment B: 17 January-3 February 2010; Fragment C: 14-21 June 2010; Fragment D: 18-21 April 2011; Fragment E: 27 April-2 May 2011; 6. Conclusion; Acknowledgements; References; Debating multiple positions in multi-party online deliberation; 1. Introduction; 2. Bin Laden is dead and what now; 3. Participants in online deliberation; 4. Sides, positions, cases, and parties in argumentation; 5. Conclusion. 
520 |a Dialectical approaches traditionally conceptualize argumentation as a discussion in which two parties debate on "two sides of an issue" (pro and con). However, many political issues engender multiple positions. This is clear in multi-party online deliberations in which often an array of competing positions is debated in one and the same discussion. A proponent of a given position thus addresses a number of possible opponents, who in turn may hold incompatible opinions. The goal of this chapter is to shed extra light on such "polylogical" clash of opinions in online deliberation, by examining t 
546 |a English. 
590 |a eBooks on EBSCOhost  |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide 
650 0 |a Persuasion (Rhetoric)  |x Political aspects. 
650 0 |a Discourse analysis  |x Political aspects. 
650 0 |a Mass media  |x Political aspects. 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Essays.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Government  |x General.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Government  |x National.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Reference.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Discourse analysis  |x Political aspects.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00894937 
650 7 |a Mass media  |x Political aspects.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01011278 
650 7 |a Persuasion (Rhetoric)  |x Political aspects.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01058899 
700 1 |a Lewinski, Marcin,  |e editor. 
700 1 |a Mohammed, Dima,  |e editor. 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |t Argumentation in political deliberation.  |d Amsterdam ; Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company, [2015]  |z 9789027242648  |w (DLC) 2015014504 
830 0 |a Benjamins current topics, 1874-0081 ;  |v 76. 
856 4 0 |u https://ebsco.uam.elogim.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1018443  |z Texto completo 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH29724858 
938 |a Coutts Information Services  |b COUT  |n 31422227 
938 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b EBLB  |n EBL2077070 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 1018443 
938 |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection  |b IDEB  |n cis31422227 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 12463806 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP