|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a2200000 a 4500 |
001 |
EBSCO_ocn871631544 |
003 |
OCoLC |
005 |
20231017213018.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr cnu---unuuu |
008 |
140307s2014 enk ob 001 0 eng d |
040 |
|
|
|a IDEBK
|b eng
|e pn
|c IDEBK
|d N$T
|d OCLCF
|d OCLCQ
|d WYU
|d QGK
|d UKAHL
|d K6U
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9780191505126
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|a 0191505129
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|a 1306477190
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9781306477192
|q (electronic bk.)
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a AU@
|b 000056895070
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a NLGGC
|b 373900015
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a NZ1
|b 16238207
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)871631544
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a B105.N65
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a PHI
|x 005000
|2 bisacsh
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a PHI
|x 034000
|2 bisacsh
|
082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 170
|2 23
|
084 |
|
|
|a BK 1570
|2 rvk
|
084 |
|
|
|a MR 7200
|2 rvk
|
049 |
|
|
|a UAMI
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Ridge, Michael.
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Impassioned belief /
|c Michael Ridge.
|
260 |
|
|
|a Oxford :
|b Oxford Scholarship Online,
|c 2014.
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
588 |
0 |
|
|a Print version record.
|
504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references and index.
|
520 |
|
|
|a We all form judgments about what ways of life are worthwhile, what we are morally required to do and so on. These so-called "normative" judgments have seemed puzzling in part because they exhibit both belief-like and desire-like features. Traditional cognitivist theories hold that these judgments are beliefs rather than desires; traditional non-cognitivist theories hold that they are desires rather than beliefs. Each of these traditions tries to accommodate or explain away what the_x000D_other tradition handles so easily. One often gets the sense that the defenders of these increasingly complex theories are trying to force a square peg into a round hole. So-called "hybrid theories" try to have the best of both worlds by understanding normative judgments as constituted by both_x000D_belief-like and desire-like states
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Cover -- Impassioned Belief -- Copyright -- Dedication -- Contents -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- Chapter 1: Locating Normative Thought and Discourse -- Chapter 2: Normative Thought and Discourse: Affective, Action-Guiding, and Acrimonious -- Chapter 3: Ecumenical Cognitivism -- Chapter 4: Introducing Ecumenical Expressivism -- Chapter 5: Compositionality, Inference, and the Frege-Geach Problem -- Chapter 6: Disagreement -- Chapter 7: Truth -- Chapter 8: Rationality -- 1: Locating Normative Thought and Discourse
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a 1. Practically Normative Thought and Discourse: A Functional Gloss2. Evaluatives -- 3. Directives -- 4. Reasons -- 5. Locating the Normative -- Conclusion -- 2: Normative Thought and Discourse: Affective, Action-Guiding, and Acrimonious -- 1. Normative Judgment: Action-Guiding -- 2. Normative Judgment: Affective -- 3. Normative Judgment: Acrimonious -- Conclusion -- 3: Ecumenical Cognitivism -- 1. The Many Ecumenical Cognitivisms -- 2. Implicative Ecumenical Cognitivism -- 3. Judgment-Individuating Ecumenical Cognitivism -- Conclusion
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a 4: Introducing Ecumenical Expressivism1. The Expressivist Gambit -- 2. Pragmatics, Semantics, and Meta-Semantics -- 3. Ideationalism and Normative Propositions -- 4. Normative Perspectives: The Power of Negative Thinking -- 5. Normative Judgment -- 6. Normative Propositions -- 7. Advantages of Ecumenical Expressivism -- Conclusion -- 5: Compositionality, Inference, and the Frege-Geach Problem -- 1. What is the Frege-Geach Problem? -- 2. Unasserted Contexts and Compositionality: Non-Ecumenical Expressivism
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a 3. Solving the Frege-Geach Problem: Offloading Logical Complexity4. Logical Validity: A First Pass -- 5. Logical Validity: Formality Regained -- 6. Intensional Contexts and Implicatures -- 7. Wishful Thinking -- Conclusion -- 6: Disagreement -- 1. Disagreement in Attitude -- 1.1 Mere difference without disagreement -- 1.2 Non-linguistic agents -- 1.3 Why privilege belief and desire? -- 1.4 Agent-relativity -- 2. Disagreement in Plan -- 2.1 Difference versus disagreement -- 2.2 Circularity -- 2.3 From practice to theory: a gap in the argument?
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a 2.4 Impasse3. Disagreement in Prescription -- 4. Ecumenical Expressivism and Disagreement in Prescription -- Conclusion -- 7: Truth -- 1. Ecumenical Expressivism, Truth-Aptness, and Subjectivism -- 2. The Deflationist Gambit -- 3. The Truth in Ecumenical Expressivism -- 4. Advantages of this Approach -- 5. The Explosion of the Normative? -- 6. What if Soames is Wrong? -- Conclusion -- 8: Rationality -- 1. Rational Capacities -- 2. Rationality as a Success Notion -- 3. Ecumenical Cognitivism Revisited -- 4. Discontinuities Revisited -- Conclusion
|
590 |
|
|
|a eBooks on EBSCOhost
|b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Norm (Philosophy)
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Practical judgment.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Practical reason.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Norme (Philosophie)
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Jugement pratique.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Raison pratique.
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a PHILOSOPHY
|x Ethics & Moral Philosophy.
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a PHILOSOPHY
|x Social.
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Norm (Philosophy)
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Practical judgment
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Practical reason
|2 fast
|
776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Print version:
|a Ridge, Michael.
|t Impassioned Belief.
|d Oxford Scholarship Online 2014
|z 1306477190
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://ebsco.uam.elogim.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=711353
|z Texto completo
|
938 |
|
|
|a Askews and Holts Library Services
|b ASKH
|n AH26202357
|
938 |
|
|
|a Askews and Holts Library Services
|b ASKH
|n AH26151759
|
938 |
|
|
|a EBSCOhost
|b EBSC
|n 711353
|
938 |
|
|
|a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection
|b IDEB
|n cis27596086
|
994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b IZTAP
|