International copyright law and access to education in developing countries : exploring multilateral legal and quasi-legal solutions /
In International Copyright Law and Access to Education in Developing Countries: Exploring Multilateral Legal and Quasi-Legal Solutions, Susan Isiko Štrba demonstrates the challenge of access to printed copyrighted educational and research materials in developing countries and proposes institutional...
Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
---|---|
Autor principal: | |
Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
Leiden ; Boston :
M. Nijhoff Pub.,
2012.
|
Colección: | Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies
10. |
Temas: | |
Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Machine generated contents note: Definition of the Problem and Objectives
- Structure of the Research
- ch. 1 A Short Primer on Copyright
- 1.1. Introduction
- 1.2. What Are Intellectual Property Rights?
- 1.3. Intellectual Property and Development in General
- 1.4. Historical Development of Copyright Protection: A Brief Survey
- 1.5. Development of Multilateral Protection of Copyright: Copyright Law Becomes a Means to Protect One Country's Works in Another Country
- 1.6. Purpose of International Copyright Protection
- 1.7. Rights Conferred by a Copyright
- 1.7.1. Reproduction Right
- 1.7.2. Translation Right
- 1.7.3. Distribution Right
- 1.8. Conclusions
- ch. 2 Special Access Needs of Developing Countries and the Impact of Copyright on Access to Education
- 2.1. Introduction
- 2.2. Understanding the Pertinent Elements of Education
- 2.2.1. Aims and Objectives of Education
- 2.2.2. Essential Features of Education.
- Note continued: 2.3. The Role of Copyright As an Access Barrier to Education in Developing Countries
- 2.4. Understanding the Special Access Needs of Developing Countries
- 2.5. Why Developing Countries Need Bulk Access to Printed Copyrighted Material
- 2.6. Conclusion
- ch. 3 The Effect of Limitations on and Specific Exceptions to Copyright on Access to Education in Developing Countries
- 3.1. Introduction
- 3.2. Limitations on Copyright Protection Do Not Promote Access to Educational Materials in Developing Countries
- 3.2.1. Creativity or Originality Requirement
- 3.2.2. Fixation Requirement
- 3.2.3. Usefulness of Limitations on Copyright Protection for Access to Education in Developing Countries
- 3.3. Limitations on Rights Conferred by a Copyright: General
- 3.4. Specific Exceptions to the Rights of Reproduction and Translation Relating to Education
- 3.4.1. Quotations
- 3.4.1.1. Lawfully Made Available to the Public
- 3.4.1.2.Compatible with Fair Practice.
- Note continued: 3.4.1.3. Must Not Exceed That Justified by the Purpose
- 3.4.2. Utilization of a Work by Way of Illustration in Teaching
- 3.4.2.1. The Meaning of "Illustration in Teaching"
- 3.4.2.2. Use Must Not Exceed the Extent Justified by the Purpose
- 3.4.2.3.Compatible with Fair Practice
- 3.4.3. Conclusions on Effect of Specific Exceptions and Limitations on Access to Education in Developing Countries
- ch. 4 Impact of the Three-Step Test under the Berne Convention and the Trips Agreement on Access to Education in Developing Countries
- 4.1. Introduction
- 4.2. The Introduction of General Exception to Copyright in International Copyright Law
- 4.2. National Limitations at the Time of the Stockholm Conference
- 4.3. The Nature of the Three-Step Test
- 4.3.1. The Three-Step Test under the Berne Convention Is Limited to the Reproduction Right While TRIPS Applies to all Rights.
- Note continued: 4.3.2. TRIPS Does Not Restrict the Enjoyment of Rights Granted under the Berne Convention
- 4.3.4. The Scope of Limitations and Exceptions under the Berne Convention are Considerably Narrow
- 4.3.5. Article 13 of Trips Restricts the Use of Exceptions
- 4.3.6. Of Authors and Right Holders: No Place for Social Interests Like Education in Trips
- 4.3.7. Importance of Differences between Article 9(2) BC and Article 13 Trips
- 4.4. The Meaning of the Three-Step Test and Its Implications for Access to Printed Copyrighted Material for Educational Purposes in Developing Countries
- 4.4.1. Certain Special Cases
- 4.4.1.1. Exceptions Must Be Narrow in Quantitative and Qualitative Sense
- 4.4.1.2. Exceptions Are Not Justified by Reasons of Public Policy
- 4.4.1.3. Certain Special Cases and Access to Education in Developing Countries
- 4.4.2."Does Not Conflict with a Normal Exploitation of the Work."
- Note continued: 4.4.2.1. Conflict with Normal Exploitation and Access to Educational Materials in Developing Countries
- 4.4.3."And That Do Not Unreasonably Prejudice the Legitimate Interests of the Author/Right Holder"
- 4.4.3.1. Legitimate Interests for Patents Are Different Than Those for Copyright
- 4.5. Exceptions to the Right of Translation
- 4.6. The Usefulness of the Three-Step Test for Access to Educational Materials in Developing Countries
- ch. 5 Special Legal Regimes for Access to Education in Developing Countries
- 5.1. Introduction
- 5.2. The Stockholm Protocol: A Sign of Lack of Interest in Access Problems of Developing Countries
- 5.2.1. Background
- 5.2.2. History of the Preparatory Work and Studies
- 5.2.3. Substantive and Procedural Provisions of the Protocol
- 5.2.4. Evaluation of the Protocol
- 5.3.A Special Legal Regime for Developing Countries: The Berne Appendix.
- Note continued: 5.3.1. The Link between the Stockholm Protocol and the Appendix to the Berne Convention
- 5.3.2. Substantive Provisions of the Appendix
- 5.3.3. Procedural Requirements of the Appendix
- 5.3.3.1. Waiting Period for Translation License
- 5.3.3.2. Waiting Period for Reproduction License
- 5.3.3.3. Requirements Applying to both Translation and Reproduction Licence
- 5.3.4. Assessment of the Berne Appendix
- 5.3.5. The Practical Consequences of the Appendix
- 5.4. Practice on Compulsory Licensing for Translation and Reproduction (Berne Appendix)
- 5.5. Conclusions on Special Legal Regimes for Access to Protected Works
- ch. 6 Models of Practice Relating to Limitations and Exceptions to Copyright for Educational Purposes
- 6.1. Introduction
- 6.2. Factual Acceptance of Fair Use and Fair Dealing by Developing Countries
- 6.3. United States: Fair Use under Section 107 of the US Copyright Act of 1976 and before the U.S. Courts.
- Note continued: 6.3.1. The Role of Industry in Defining Copying for Classroom Use: Clarifying the Purpose of the Agreement on Guidelines for Classroom Copying in Not-for-Profit Educational Institutions with Respect to Books and Periodicals
- 6.3.2. Judicial Practice on Fair Use and Access to Printed Educational Material
- 6.3.2.1. Purpose and Character of the Use, Including Whether Such Use Is of a Commercial Nature or Is for Non-Profit Educational Purposes
- 6.2.1.2. Amount and Substantiality of the Portion Used
- 6.3.2.3. Effect of the Use upon the Potential Market or Value of the Copyrighted Work
- 6.3.3.Compatibility of Fair Use Doctrine with the Three-Step Test: The Market Effect Test
- 6.3.4. The Relationship between Market Effect, Parody and the Three-Step Test
- 6.3.5. Application of Fair Use to Developing Countries: The Case of Africa
- 6.3.5.1.A Case for Fair Use in Developing Countries.
- Note continued: 6.4. Fair Dealing for the Purpose of Research or Private Study: The Case of Canada
- 6.4.1. The Court Lists Factors for Determining Fair Dealing: Towards International Harmonization of the Fairness Principle
- 6.4.2. The Court Restates the Purpose of Copyright: Towards a Balance between Interests of Copyright Owners and Users
- 6.4.3. CCH Canadian and the Transformation of Exceptions: Court Defines Exceptions in Very Broad Terms
- 6.4.4.A Rights Approach to Exceptions: Exceptions and User Rights
- 6.4.5. Broad Definition of Exceptions Does Not Conflict with the Three-Step Test
- 6.4.6. Lessons for Access to Education in Developing Countries
- 6.5.A "Fairness" Model for Copyright and Access to Education in Developing Countries
- 6.5.1. Developing Countries Can Devise Educational Exceptions through Purposeful Interpretation of Legislation: The Case of India
- 6.6.Compulsory Licensing for Copyright in Printed Works beyond the Berne Appendix.
- Note continued: 6.6.1.Compulsory Licensing (CL) for Reproduction of Printed Material: Lessons from Australia
- 6.6.1.1.A Case for Quasi Compulsory Licensing System for Developing Countries
- 6.6.2. Developing Countries Can Issue Compulsory Licences for Printed Copyrighted Material outside the System Provided by the Berne Appendix
- 6.6.3."Compulsory Licences" in Place of Injunctions to Avoid Public Injury: Examples from the United States and India
- 6.6.3.1. The Case of Abend v. MCA, Inc
- 6.6.3.2. The Case of eBay v. MercExchange, L.L.C.
- 6.3.3.3. India: Civic Chandran v. Ammini Amma
- 6.6.3.4.Compulsory Licensing Instead of Injunctions under International Copyright Law
- 6.7. Conclusions on Models of Practice
- ch. 7 Institutional and Normative Solutions for Access to Copyrighted Material for Educational Purposes
- 7.1. Introduction
- 7.2. Solutions in the World Trade Organization for Access to Health: Lessons for Copyright and Access to Education.
- Note continued: 7.2.1. Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health
- 7.2.1.1. Challenges to the Use of Parallel Imports and Compulsory Licensing in South Africa and Brazil
- 7.2.1.2. Major Provisions of the Declaration Relevant to Public Health
- 7.2.1.4. Legal Status and Effect of the Declaration
- 7.2.2. Legal Recognition of the Ineffectiveness of Flexibilities in Developing Countries: The Decision on Paragraph 6
- 7.2.2.3. Evaluation of the Decision
- 7.2.3. Amendment of the TRIPS Agreement
- 7.2.4. Extension of the Transition Period for LDCs
- 7.2.5. Lessons from the WTO for Copyright and Education
- 7.3. The WIPO DA: Recent Adoption by WIPO of Development Approaches to Copyrighted Works
- 7.3.2. Legal Basis of the Development Agenda: A Constitutional Reform of WIPO
- 7.3.3.A Survey of Some `Agenda' Items Relevant to Education
- 7.3.3.1. Technical Assistance
- 7.3.3.2. Norm Setting, Flexibilities, Public Policy and Public Domain.
- Note continued: 7.3.5. Establishment of the Committee on Development and Intellectual Property: A Formal Amendment of the WIPO Convention and Modification of Objectives of WIPO
- 7.3.7. Evaluation: The DA Is a Model for Future Development of Access Standards in International Copyright Law
- 7.4.7. Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR): Developing Access Principles and Rules for Copyright and Education
- 7.3.7.2. Proposals for Work on Limitations and Exceptions for Education, Libraries and Disabled Persons: Transforming Flexibilities to User Rights
- 7.4. Evaluation of Recent Developments in WIPO and Some Recommendations.