Evaluating scientific evidence : an interdisciplinary framework for intellectual due process /

Scientific evidence is crucial in a burgeoning number of litigated cases, legislative enactments, regulatory decisions, and scholarly arguments. Evaluating Scientific Evidence explores the question of what counts as scientific knowledge, a question that has become a focus of heated courtroom and sch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Beecher-Monas, Erica, 1949-2017
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press, ©2007.
Colección:Law in context.
Temas:
Evidence, Expert > United States.
Forensic sciences > United States.
Evidence, Expert.
Forensic sciences.
Forensic Sciences
Expertises > États-Unis.
Criminalistique > États-Unis.
Expertises.
Criminalistique.
forensic science.
LAW > Civil Procedure.
LAW > Legal Services.
POLITICAL SCIENCE > Government > Judicial Branch.
Preuves.
Expertises judiciaires.
Médecine.
Droit pénal.
Evaluation.
Pays occidentaux.
Recherche interdisciplinaire.
Evidence, Expert
Forensic sciences
Beweisführung
Beweismittel
Strafverfahrensrecht
United States
USA
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Triers of science
  • Intellectual due process
  • A framework of analysis
  • Toxic torts and the causation conundrum
  • Criminal identification evidence
  • Future dangerousness testimony : the epistemology of prediction
  • Barefoot or Daubert? : a cognitive perspective on vetting future
  • Dangerousness testimony
  • Future dangerousness and sexual offenders
  • Models of rationality : evaluating social psychology
  • Evaluating battered woman syndrome.

Ejemplares similares