Cargando…

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Mu 4500
001 EBOOKCENTRAL_on1047913451
003 OCoLC
005 20240329122006.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|---|||||
008 180811s2018 enk o 000 0 eng d
040 |a EBLCP  |b eng  |e pn  |c EBLCP  |d DEBBG  |d OCLCQ  |d EBLCP  |d OCLCQ  |d LOA  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCL 
020 |a 9781509904969 
020 |a 1509904964 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000070392996 
035 |a (OCoLC)1047913451 
050 4 |a KD4080  |b .T977 2018 
082 0 4 |a 342.42085 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Tyrrell, Hélène. 
245 1 0 |a Human Rights in the UK and the Influence of Foreign Jurisprudence. 
260 |a London :  |b Bloomsbury Publishing PLC,  |c 2018. 
300 |a 1 online resource (261 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Hart Studies in Comparative Public Law Ser. 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
505 0 |a Intro; Acknowledgements; Contents; List of Figures and Tables; Table of Cases; 1. Introduction; I. Structure of the Book; II. Style; 2. Research Methodology; I. Research Parameters; II. Interviews; 3. Legitimacy and Authority; I. Persuasive Authority; II. The Influence of Domestic v Supranational Jurisprudence; III. Conclusions; 4. The Purpose of Foreign Jurisprudence; I. Many Minds; II. Decoration; III. Courtesy; IV. Supplements; V. Consensus; VI. Conclusions; 5. Foreign Jurisprudence in the UK Supreme Court; I. The Extent to Which Foreign Jurisprudence is Used. 
505 8 |a II. The Individual Approaches of the JusticesIII. Accessing Foreign Jurisprudence; IV. The Influence of Common Law Jurisdictions; V. The Effect of Changing Judgment Styles; VI. Conclusions; 6. Foreign Jurisprudence as a Heuristic Tool; I. Gap Filling; II. An Analytical Lens; III. Reassurance; IV. Conclusions; 7. The Pursuit of a Common Enterprise; I. Using Foreign Jurisprudence to Promote Uniformity; II. Uniformity under the Human Rights Act; III. The Absence of a Supranational Court; IV. Conclusions; 8. Instrumental Uses of Foreign Jurisprudence; I. To Confirm or Bolster Conclusions. 
505 8 |a II. The Absence of Strasbourg JurisprudenceIII. 'Departing' from Strasbourg; IV. Conclusions; 9. Conclusions; I. An Absence of Guiding Principles; II. The Individual Approaches of the Justices; III. Foreign Jurisprudence as a Heuristic Tool; IV. Providing a Given Audience with Reasons; V. The Effect of Changing Working Methods; VI. Reflections on Judicial Reasoning at the Supreme Court; Appendix 1: UK Supreme Court Appointments 2009-17; Appendix 2: Interview Design; Bibliography; Index. 
590 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b Ebook Central Academic Complete 
610 1 0 |a Great Britain.  |b Supreme Court. 
610 1 7 |a Great Britain.  |b Supreme Court  |2 fast 
650 0 |a Human rights  |z England. 
650 0 |a International and municipal law  |z England. 
650 0 |a Conflict of laws  |z England. 
650 6 |a Droits de l'homme (Droit international)  |z Angleterre. 
650 6 |a Droit international et droit interne  |z Angleterre. 
650 6 |a Droit international privé  |z Angleterre. 
650 7 |a Conflict of laws  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Human rights  |2 fast 
650 7 |a International and municipal law  |2 fast 
651 7 |a England  |2 fast  |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJpYDdYvBpjXV6WpybK68C 
758 |i has work:  |a Human rights in the UK and the influence of foreign jurisprudence (Text)  |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFBXdJYFyKVHjRfFhG3xXd  |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Tyrrell, Hélène.  |t Human Rights in the UK and the Influence of Foreign Jurisprudence.  |d London : Bloomsbury Publishing PLC, ©2018  |z 9781509904945 
830 0 |a Hart Studies in Comparative Public Law Ser. 
856 4 0 |u https://ebookcentral.uam.elogim.com/lib/uam-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5473323  |z Texto completo 
938 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b EBLB  |n EBL5473323 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP