The Court of Justice of the European Union : Subsidiary and Proportionality.

In the Court of Justice of the European Union, Subsidiarity and Proportionality Kate Shaw sets out how a subsidiarity and proportionality review applied to competences could be anchored by the Court of Justice when balancing the competing interests in cases concerning the residency rights of EU citi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Shaw, Kate
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Boston : BRILL, 2018.
Colección:Nijhoff Studies in European Union Law Ser.
Temas:
Court of Justice of the European Union.
Court of Justice of the European Union
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Mi 4500
001 EBOOKCENTRAL_on1030818237
003 OCoLC
005 20240329122006.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|---|||||
008 180407s2018 mau o 000 0 eng d
040 |a EBLCP  |b eng  |e pn  |c EBLCP  |d OCLCQ  |d DEBBG  |d UAB  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCF  |d UEJ  |d OTZ  |d AU@  |d OCLCQ  |d NRC  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO 
020 |a 9789004344426 
020 |a 900434442X 
024 8 |a 10.1163/9789004344426 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000073097574 
035 |a (OCoLC)1030818237 
050 4 |a KJE5461  |b .S53 2018 
072 7 |a LB  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a LAW051000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 341.242/2284 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Shaw, Kate. 
245 1 4 |a The Court of Justice of the European Union :  |b Subsidiary and Proportionality. 
260 |a Boston :  |b BRILL,  |c 2018. 
300 |a 1 online resource (350 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Nijhoff Studies in European Union Law Ser. 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
505 0 |a Intro; The Court of Justice of the European Union; Copyright; Contents; 1 Introduction; 1 Introduction and Overview; 2 Competence, Conferral and the Principle of Subsidiarity; 3 Anchoring Subsidiarity and the CJEU; 4 Case Selection; 5 Conclusion; 2 Subsidiarity and Proportionality and the Balance of Power between the EU and the Member States; 1 Introduction; 2 Subsidiarity as a Legal Principle and Rule; 2.1 The Adoption of Subsidiarity as a Legal and Constitutional Principle by the EU to Limit Unnecessary eu Intervention. 
505 8 |a 3 Proportionality as a Widely Recognised Concept Used as a Test in Judicial Review3.1 Introduction; 3.2 Proportionality as a Widely Recognised Concept Used as a Test in Judicial Review; 3.3 Differing Interpretations of the Operationalization of Proportionality; 3.4 Differing Levels of Intensity of Judicial Review by the CJEU of National Restrictions; 4 Subsidiarity and Proportionality in eu Law-Making in Shared Areas of Competence; 4.1 A Conceptual Link between Conferral, Subsidiarity and Proportionality. 
505 8 |a 4.2 Subsidiarity Alongside Proportionality in EU Law-Making in Shared Areas of Competence5 EU Subsidiarity and Essentially Contested Concepts?; 6 Subsidiarity and the Introduction of the Yellow Card Procedure Following the Treaty of Lisbon; 7 Conclusion; 3 Subsidiarity and Proportionality and the Role of the CJEU in Relation to Interpretation of Shared Competence; 1 Introduction; 2 Introducing the CJEU: A Unique Supranational Court; 3 The Pro-union Interpretative Tendency of the cjeu; 4 Subsidiarity and Judicial Review by the CJEU of Political Institutions. 
505 8 |a 5 Operationalising Subsidiarity and Proportionality Applied to Competences as Tool of Judicial Review6 Operationalising Subsidiarity in the Context of the Common Market; 7 Engaging the CJEU More Meaningfully with Subsidiarity in Its Legal Reasoning Outside of Judicial Review; 8 Conclusion; 4 The CJEU, Subsidiarity and Determining the Residency Rights of EU Citizens; 1 Introduction; 2 Theoretical Perspectives -- The Concept of Citizenship and Its Link to Political Identity; 2.1 Introduction; 2.2 The Concept of Citizenship and Its Link to Political Identity Which in an eu Context. 
505 8 |a 2.3 The Limits of EU Citizenship2.4 The Problems of Differing Levels of Protection from Expulsion for Different Categories of EU Citizens; 2.5 Conclusion; 3 Directive 2004/38 and the Distinction between Economically Active and Non-economically Active eu Citizens; 3.1 Introduction; 3.2 The Introduction of EU Citizenship Provisions Following the Treaty of Maastricht; 3.3 The Strengthening of Residence Rights in Directive 2004/38; 3.4 The CJEU, the Fundamental Status of EU Citizenship and Residency Rights of eu Citizens. 
500 |a 3.5 The Reaffirming and Strengthening of the Residence Rights Attaching to EU Citizens by the Treaty of Lisbon in Light of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. 
520 |a In the Court of Justice of the European Union, Subsidiarity and Proportionality Kate Shaw sets out how a subsidiarity and proportionality review applied to competences could be anchored by the Court of Justice when balancing the competing interests in cases concerning the residency rights of EU citizens. The book also considers the extent to which a court which is dedicated to enhancing the European project is really able to be an independent arbiter between the EU and the Member States in this context. Both the legal reasoning of the Court and the controversial nature of residency rights of EU citizens are legally and politically very topical at the moment and of interest to legal academics and law students. 
590 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b Ebook Central Academic Complete 
610 2 0 |a Court of Justice of the European Union. 
610 2 7 |a Court of Justice of the European Union  |2 fast 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Shaw, Kate.  |t Court of Justice of the European Union : Subsidiary and Proportionality.  |d Boston : BRILL, ©2018  |z 9789004344280 
830 0 |a Nijhoff Studies in European Union Law Ser. 
856 4 0 |u https://ebookcentral.uam.elogim.com/lib/uam-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5331666  |z Texto completo 
938 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b EBLB  |n EBL5331666 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP 

Ejemplares similares