Cargando…
The inter-state application under the European Convention on Human Rights : between collective enforcement of human rights and international dispute settlement /
The comprehensive analysis about the Inter-State Application under the ECHR by Isabella Risini fills a gap in the literature. The study provides an informed proposal to strengthen the protection of human rights in Europe and the role of the Court. --
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Leiden :
Brill Nijhoff,
2018.
|
| Colección: | International studies in human rights ;
Volume 125 |
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Intro; The Inter-State Application under the European Convention on Human Rights: Between Collective Enforcement of Human Rights and International Dispute Settlement; Copyright; Contents; Acknowledgements; Acronyms and Abbreviations, Legal Citation Format; 1 Any Alleged Breach: The Inter-State Application under the ECHR; 1.1 Growing Relevance of the Inter-State Application under the ECHR; 1.2 Object and Purpose of the Inter-State Application; 1.3 Link to Current Debate Concerning the Role of the European Court of Human Rights
- 1.4 Stream of Inquiry: Between Collective Enforcement and International Dispute Settlement1.4.1 The Drafting Process and the Evolution of the Supervisory Framework of the ECHR; 1.4.2 Comparisons in Light of Leading Question; 1.4.3 Case Law: Documentation, Context and Functions; 1.4.4 Recommendations for Reform; 1.5 Collective Enforcement and International Dispute Settlement; 2 The Inception and Evolution of the Inter-State Application under the European Convention on Human Rights; 2.1 Overview: The Privilege of Hindsight; 2.1.1 Filling the Academic Gap; 2.1.2 Methodological Considerations
- 2.1.3 Descriptive Concern of the Chapter2.2 International Human Rights on the Universal Level: Developments Without Specific Enforcement Structures; 2.3 The Regional Initiative: The Council of Europe and Its Idiosyncrasies; 2.3.1 Human Rights: A Central Feature and the Need for Enforcement; 2.3.2 The Object and Purpose of the Convention: More Collective Enforcement than Individual Justice; 2.4 Retracing the Notion of Collective and Enforcement; 2.4.1 Introducing the Notion of Collective Enforcement; 2.4.2 Enforcement
- A Point of Contention; 2.5 The 1950 Convention Revisited
- 2.5.1 Amenable to Judicial Enforcement: The Substantive Guarantees of the ECHR2.5.2 The Architecture of Supervision: A Complex Compromise; 2.5.3 Supervision à la Carte; 2.5.4 Evaluation of the 1950 Convention's Supervisory Structure; 2.6 Towards Judicial Supervision: Subsequent Amendments of the Convention; 2.7 Results: The Inter-State Application between Collective Enforcement and International Dispute Settlement; 3 International Dispute Settlement and Collective Enforcement Functions of the Inter-State Application Approached Through Comparison
- 3.1 Inter-State Litigation in Strasbourg and The Hague
- A Comparison with a View to the Function of International Dispute Settlement3.1.1 Overview; 3.1.2 Jurisdiction Compared; 3.1.3 The Respective Yardsticks and the Cinderella Problem; 3.1.4 Interim Result: Dispute Settlement Functions in Light of the Object and Purpose of the Inter-State Application?; 3.2 The Inter-State and the Individual Application under the European Convention on Human Rights
- A Comparison with a View to the Function of Collective Enforcement; 3.2.1 Overview; 3.2.3 Standing