Cargando…
Corporate jurisdiction, academic heresy, and fraternal correction at the University of Paris, 1200-1400 /
In Corporate Jurisdiction, Academic Heresy, and Fraternal Correction at the University of Paris, 1200-1400, Gregory S. Moule explains how the theological faculty acquired independent jurisdiction over cases of academic heresy among its membership. He convincingly demonstrates that the faculty's...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Boston :
Brill,
2016.
|
| Colección: | Education and society in the Middle Ages and Renaissance.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Preface; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; Chapter 1 Introduction; The Foulechat Controversy; The Monteson Controversy; The Factors Affecting the Faculty's Jurisdiction; Medieval Concepts of Jurisdiction; Corporate Theory and the Faculty of Theology; The Role of the Bachelors in the Faculty; Conclusion; Chapter 2 The Early History of the Faculty of Theology: Evidence for the Model of Bishop and Chapter in the Faculty; The Office of the Chancellor; The Office of the Dean; The Chancellor and the Masters: Their Relations; Conclusion.
- Chapter 3 The Corporate Development of the Faculty of TheologyThe Conflict of 1219-1228; The Right to Make Statutes; The Model and the Secular-Mendicant Controversy; Conclusion; Chapter 4 Jurisdiction and the Cathedral Chapter: Gratian and the Decretists; The Model of Shared Jurisdiction: The Contribution of Gratian; The Model of Shared Jurisdiction: The Contribution ofthe Decretists; Conclusion; Chapter 5 Jurisdiction of the Cathedral Chapter: Episcopus Nullius and Irrefragabili; The Contributions of Johannes Teutonicus, Vincentius Hispanus, and Damasus; The Contribution of Goffredus de Trano.
- The Contribution of Innocent IVBernard of Parma and the Ordinary Gloss; The Contribution of Hostiensis; The Contribution of Johannes Andreae; The Distribution of Jurisdiction within the Chapter; The Crime of Heresy and the Jurisdiction of the Chapter; Conclusion; Chapter 6 Jurisdiction, Procedure, and the Censure of Academic Heresy in the Faculty of Theology; Jean Gerson and the Censure of Heresy; The Canon Law of Heresy and the Jurisdiction of the Faculty of Theology; The Roles of the Dean and the Chancellor in the Censure of Academic Heresy.
- The Role of Outside Agents in the Censure of Academic HeresyThe Investigative Process in Faculty and Chapter; Conclusion; Chapter 7 The Debate over the Jurisdiction of the Faculty of Theology; John of Monteson and the Theological Faculty's Jurisdiction; The Tractatus, or Apologia, of Pierre d'Ailly; Analysis of the Tractatus, or, Apologia; The Arguments from Papal Privilege and Human Law; The Argument from Divine Law; The Argument from Custom; The Role of Custom in the Legal System; The Territorial Scope of the Faculty's Jurisdiction; D'Ailly's Response to Monteson.
- Evaluation of d'Ailly's ArgumentThe Chronological Development of the Faculty's Jurisdiction; Conclusion; Chapter 8 Judas, Monteson, and Fraternal Correction at Paris; Fraternal Correction and the Parisian Faculty of Theology; The Sources of Fraternal Correction; Fraternal Correction in the Process of Censure at Paris; Judas, Fraternal Correction, and the Parisian Faculty of Theology; The Treatment of Judas by Christ at the Last Supper; The Rule of Augustine and Fraternal Correction; Conclusion; Chapter 9 Fraternal Correction and Its Role in Academic Censure at the University of Paris.