Cargando…
Intellectual Property and the Common Law.
Leading scholars of intellectual property and information policy examine what the common law can contribute to discussions about intellectual property's scope, structure and function.
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
New York :
Cambridge University Press,
2013.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | EBOOKCENTRAL_ocn862614369 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20240329122006.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr |n||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 131111s2013 nyu o 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a EBLCP |b eng |e pn |c EBLCP |d MHW |d OCLCQ |d DEBSZ |d OCLCQ |d YDXCP |d OCLCQ |d CHVBK |d OCLCO |d OCLCF |d OCLCQ |d WIPOS |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL | ||
| 020 | |a 9781107464766 | ||
| 020 | |a 1107464765 | ||
| 029 | 1 | |a AU@ |b 000052906074 | |
| 029 | 1 | |a CHNEW |b 000899348 | |
| 029 | 1 | |a DEBSZ |b 409803146 | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)862614369 | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a K1401 .I5524 2013 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 346.048 |
| 049 | |a UAMI | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Balganesh, Shyamkrishna. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Intellectual Property and the Common Law. |
| 260 | |a New York : |b Cambridge University Press, |c 2013. | ||
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (578 pages) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Contributors; Acknowledgments; Introduction; I. Background: What is the Common Law?; II. Overview; A. Judge-Made Intellectual Property Law; B. The Common Law Method in Intellectual Property; C. State Intellectual Property Law; D. Plural Values in Intellectual Property; E. Parallels between the Substantive Common Law and Intellectual Property; Conclusion: A Common Theme; Part I Judge-Made Intellectual Property Law; 1 Judges and Property; Introduction; I. Rejecting Property Exceptionalism; II. The Character of Property; III. Grand Style Adjudication; IV. Legislatures and Courts. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a A. PerformanceB. Legitimacy; Concluding Remarks; 2 Equitable Intellectual Property; Introduction; I. Misappropriation; II. Equity as a Solution to Opportunism; III. Judicial Regulation of the Competitive Process; IV. Conclusion; 3 The Mixed Heritage of Federal Intellectual Property Law and Ramifications for Statutory Interpretation; I. The Formative Period; A. Copyright Law; B. Patent Law; II. Statutory Consolidation, Codification, and Revision; A. Copyright Law; B. Patent Law; III. The Modern Era; A. Copyright Law; B. Patent Law. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a IV. The Ramifications of the Mixed Heritage of Copyright and Patent Law for the Continued Evolution of Intellectual Property Law4 Interpretive Methodology and Delegations to Courts; Introduction; I. Common Law Statutes and Congressional Delegations; II. "Sweeping, General Terms"; III. Common Law History; IV. Delegations to Courts Today; 5 Dynamic Claim Interpretation; Introduction; I. Patents and Claims; II. Claim Construction; III. Reading Legal Texts; IV. Ordinary Claim Meaning; V. Dynamic Statutory Interpretation; VI. Constructing Claims Dynamically; Conclusion. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 6 Did Phillips Change Anything?Introduction: The Design of the Federal Circuit; I. The Prelude to Phillips: A Recap of Recent Claim Construction History; A. An Introduction to Claim Construction; B. Claim Construction and Institutional Design; C. Earlier Related Studies and Their Findings; D. The Phillips v. AWH Response; II. Study Design and Methodology; A. About Content Analysis; B. Database Construction; C. Testing for Reliability; III. Results; A. The Phillips Effect, Part 1: Aggregate Results; B. The Phillips Effect, Part 2: Methodological Trends; C. Why Did Phillips Not Change the Law? | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 1. The Nonbinding Nature of the Phillips Opinion2. The Federal Circuit's Decision-Making Process; 3. A Results-Oriented Court; 4. Patent Drafting Drives the Results; 5. Jurisprudential Time Lag; 6. Failure of the Study; D. If Phillips Did Not Change the Law, What Did It Do?; 1. Reduce Disputes among Federal Circuit Judges?; 2. Reduce Appeals on Claim Construction?; IV. Is the Federal Circuit Succeeding? Revisited: The Lessons of Phillips; A. Wrong Choice Number One: Embracing the Holistic Methodological Approach; B. Wrong Choice Number Two: The "Anything Goes" Phillips Opinion. | |
| 500 | |a C. Wrong Choice Number Three: Phillips Cannot Be Squared with Cybor. | ||
| 520 | |a Leading scholars of intellectual property and information policy examine what the common law can contribute to discussions about intellectual property's scope, structure and function. | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
| 590 | |a ProQuest Ebook Central |b Ebook Central Academic Complete | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Intellectual property. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Common law. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Propriété intellectuelle. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Common law. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a intellectual property. |2 aat | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Common law |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Intellectual property |2 fast | |
| 758 | |i has work: |a Intellectual property and the Common law (Text) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PD38fHy4qfFRHWPPWwpMGvw |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork | ||
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Balganesh, Shyamkrishna. |t Intellectual Property and the Common Law. |d New York : Cambridge University Press, ©2013 |z 9781107014152 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://ebookcentral.uam.elogim.com/lib/uam-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1543543 |z Texto completo |
| 936 | |a BATCHLOAD | ||
| 938 | |a ProQuest Ebook Central |b EBLB |n EBL1543543 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 11203887 | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b IZTAP | ||