Originalism and the good constitution /

Mostrar otras versiones (1)

John McGinnis and Michael Rappaport argue that the text of the Constitution and its Amendments should be adhered to by the Supreme Court because it was enacted by supermajorities. A text approved by supermajorities has special value in a democracy because it has unusually wide support and tends to m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autores principales: McGinnis, John O., 1957- (Autor), Rappaport, Michael B., 1960- (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, 2013.
Temas:
Constitutional law > United States.
Constitutional law > Philosophy.
Origin (Philosophy)
Judicial review > United States.
Droit constitutionnel > Philosophie.
Origine (Philosophie)
Contrôle juridictionnel des lois > États-Unis.
LAW > Constitutional.
LAW > Public.
LAW > Legal History.
Constitutional law
Constitutional law > Philosophy
Judicial review
United States
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Descripción
Sumario:John McGinnis and Michael Rappaport argue that the text of the Constitution and its Amendments should be adhered to by the Supreme Court because it was enacted by supermajorities. A text approved by supermajorities has special value in a democracy because it has unusually wide support and tends to maximize the welfare of the greatest number.
Descripción Física:1 online resource (298 pages)
Bibliografía:Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN:9780674726260
067472626X
0674727363
9780674727366

Ejemplares similares