Proving the unprovable : the role of law, science, and speculation in adjudicating culpability and dangerousness /

The author proposes a number of ways the courts can ensure that experts provide the best possible information about ultimately unknowable past mental states and future behavior, arguing that a rigorous demonstration of scientific validity from expert witnesses may often be unfair and can diminish th...

Description complète

Détails bibliographiques
Cote:Libro Electrónico
Auteur principal: Slobogin, Christopher, 1951-
Format: Électronique eBook
Langue:Inglés
Publié: New York : Oxford University Press, 2007.
Collection:American Psychology-Law Society series.
Sujets:
Evidence, Expert > United States.
Criminal liability > United States > Psychological aspects.
Criminal liability > Social aspects > United States.
Violent offenders > United States.
Criminal psychology > United States.
Forensic psychology > United States.
Forensic sociology > United States.
Expert Testimony > legislation & jurisprudence
Forensic Psychiatry > legislation & jurisprudence
Dangerous Behavior
Liability, Legal ⁷̧⁰́₍z United States.
Expertises > États-Unis.
Criminels violents > États-Unis.
Psychologie légale > États-Unis.
Sociologie légale > États-Unis.
Criminal liability > Psychological aspects
Criminal liability > Social aspects
Criminal psychology
Evidence, Expert
Forensic psychology
Forensic sociology
Violent offenders
United States
Accès en ligne:Texto completo
Table des matières:
  • The need for nuance
  • Diagnoses, syndromes, and criminal responsibility
  • The case for informed speculation
  • Redefining probative value
  • Beyond relevance
  • The current state of the science and the law
  • Are there "experts" on dangerousness?
  • The structure of expertise in criminal cases.

Documents similaires