Cargando…

Discussion of the Committee on Daubert Standards : summary of meetings /

In 1993, the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., laid out a new test for federal trial judges to use when determining the admissibility of expert testimony. In Daubert, the Court ruled that judges should act as gatekeepers, assessing the reliability of the scientific...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Hanna, Kathi E.
Autor Corporativo: National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Daubert Standards
Otros Autores: Mazza, Anne-Marie
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Washington, D.C. : National Academies Press, 2006.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 a 4500
001 EBOOKCENTRAL_ocn567897416
003 OCoLC
005 20240329122006.0
006 m o d
007 cr cn|||||||||
008 080807s2006 dcu ob 000 0 eng d
040 |a CCO  |b eng  |e pn  |c CCO  |d E7B  |d OCLCQ  |d COCUF  |d CUY  |d CUS  |d N$T  |d YDXCP  |d IDEBK  |d NTE  |d TFW  |d WVH  |d ORU  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d EBLCP  |d DEBSZ  |d OCLCQ  |d AZK  |d AGLDB  |d MOR  |d PIFBR  |d ZCU  |d OCLCQ  |d MERUC  |d OCLCQ  |d U3W  |d STF  |d WRM  |d WCO  |d OCLCQ  |d VTS  |d NRAMU  |d ICG  |d OCLCQ  |d VT2  |d OCLCQ  |d LVT  |d TKN  |d DKC  |d OCLCQ  |d M8D  |d UKAHL  |d OCLCQ  |d BOL  |d AJS  |d INARC  |d QGK  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCL 
019 |a 73693369  |a 226376718  |a 640036291  |a 647561008  |a 722500655  |a 814464549  |a 923276976  |a 961546510  |a 962675966  |a 1114461187  |a 1259202236 
020 |a 0309662494  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 9780309662499  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 1280567333 
020 |a 9781280567339 
020 |a 0309181100 
020 |a 9780309181105 
020 |a 9786610567331 
020 |a 6610567336 
020 |z 0309102480 
020 |z 9780309102483 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000051596886 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV043072197 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV044108581 
029 1 |a DEBSZ  |b 422248770 
029 1 |a DEBSZ  |b 452572908 
029 1 |a NZ1  |b 12438030 
035 |a (OCoLC)567897416  |z (OCoLC)73693369  |z (OCoLC)226376718  |z (OCoLC)640036291  |z (OCoLC)647561008  |z (OCoLC)722500655  |z (OCoLC)814464549  |z (OCoLC)923276976  |z (OCoLC)961546510  |z (OCoLC)962675966  |z (OCoLC)1114461187  |z (OCoLC)1259202236 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 4 |a KF8961.Z9  |b H366 2006eb 
072 7 |a POL  |x 040030  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 062000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 012000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a GBC  |2 bicssc 
082 0 4 |a 347.73/67  |2 22 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Hanna, Kathi E. 
245 1 0 |a Discussion of the Committee on Daubert Standards :  |b summary of meetings /  |c Kathi E. Hanna and Anne-Marie Mazza, rapporteurs. 
260 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b National Academies Press,  |c 2006. 
300 |a 1 online resource (ix, 35 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
340 |g polychrome.  |2 rdacc  |0 http://rdaregistry.info/termList/RDAColourContent/1003 
347 |a data file 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (page 21). 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
520 |a In 1993, the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., laid out a new test for federal trial judges to use when determining the admissibility of expert testimony. In Daubert, the Court ruled that judges should act as gatekeepers, assessing the reliability of the scientific methodology and reasoning that supports expert testimony. The resulting judicial screening of expert testimony has been particularly consequential. While the Supreme Court sought to bring better science into the courtroom, questions remain about whether the lower courts' application of Daubert accords with scientific practices. This report summarizes discussions held by an ad hoc committee of the The National Academies to consider the impact of Daubert and subsequent Supreme Court opinions and to identify questions for future study. 
505 0 |a FrontMatter -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Overview of Key Supreme Court Decisions -- 3 The Legal Landscape Post-Daubert -- 4 Evidence Synthesis: The Question of Causation -- 5 Areas Needing Further Study -- Selected References -- Appendixes -- Appendix A Committee Biographies -- Appendix B Meeting Agenda 
546 |a English. 
590 |a eBooks on EBSCOhost  |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide 
590 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b Ebook Central Academic Complete 
650 0 |a Evidence, Expert  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Admissible evidence  |z United States. 
650 6 |a Expertises  |z États-Unis. 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Government  |x Judicial Branch.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Legal Services.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a LAW  |x Civil Procedure.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Admissible evidence  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Evidence, Expert  |2 fast 
651 7 |a United States  |2 fast  |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq 
655 4 |a Computer network resources. 
700 1 |a Mazza, Anne-Marie. 
710 2 |a National Research Council (U.S.).  |b Committee on Daubert Standards. 
758 |i has work:  |a Discussion of the Committee on Daubert Standards (Text)  |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGYVMGW7BwQTqjw8DjpQMP  |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Hanna, Kathi E.  |t Discussion of the Committee on Daubert Standards.  |d Washington, D.C. : National Academies Press, 2006  |w (DLC) 2006284696 
856 4 0 |u https://ebookcentral.uam.elogim.com/lib/uam-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3378135  |z Texto completo 
936 |a BATCHLOAD 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH36616926 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH36567761 
938 |a EBL - Ebook Library  |b EBLB  |n EBL3378135 
938 |a ebrary  |b EBRY  |n ebr10141215 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 170125 
938 |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection  |b IDEB  |n 56733 
938 |a Internet Archive  |b INAR  |n discussionofcomm0000hann 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 2479975 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP