Judicial review and the constitution /

This collection of essays presents opposing sides of the debate over the foundations of judicial review. In this work, however, the discussion of whether the 'ultra vires' doctrine is best characterised as a central principle of administrative law or as a harmless, justificatory fiction is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor Corporativo: University of Cambridge. Centre for Public Law
Otros Autores: Forsyth, C. F.
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Oxford ; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2000.
Temas:
Judicial review of administrative acts > Great Britain.
Contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration > Grande-Bretagne.
POLITICAL SCIENCE > Government > Judicial Branch.
LAW > Legal Services.
LAW > Civil Procedure.
Judicial review of administrative acts
Toetsingsrecht.
Bestuursprocesrecht.
Grondwettigheid.
Great Britain
Congressen (vorm)
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Half Title Page; Half Title verso; Title Page; Title verso; Preface; Contents; Acknowledgements; Contributors; List of Participants; Table of Cases; Table of Legislation; The Debate Begins; 1. Is the Ultra Vires Rule the Basis of Judicial Review?; 2. Of Fig Leaves and Fairy Tales: The Ultra Vires Doctrine, the Sovereignty of Parliament and Judicial Review; 3. Ultra Vires and the Foundations of Judicial Review; 4. An Extract from: Illegality: The Problem of Jurisdiction; 5. The Ultra Vires Doctrine in a Constitutional Setting: Still the Central Principle of Administrative Law.

Ejemplares similares