Assessing research-doctorate programs : a methodology study /

Show other versions (1)

How should we assess and present information about the quality of research-doctorate programs? In recommending that the 1995 NRC rankings in Assessing the Quality of Research-Doctorate Programs: Continuity and Change be updated as soon as possible, this study presents an improved approach to doctora...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Call Number:Libro Electrónico
Corporate Author: National Research Council (U.S.). Committee to Examine the Methodology for the Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs
Other Authors: Ostriker, J. P., Kuh, Charlotte V., Voytuk, James A.
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:Inglés
Published: Washington, D.C. : National Academies Press, ©2003.
Subjects:
Research > United States > Evaluation.
Doctor of philosophy degree > United States > Evaluation.
Science > Study and teaching (Higher) > United States > Evaluation.
Engineering > Study and teaching (Higher) > United States > Evaluation.
Humanities > Study and teaching (Higher) > United States > Evaluation.
Science.
Physical sciences.
Health services administration.
Medical care.
Research.
Universities and colleges.
Life sciences.
Education, Professional
Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms
Science
Quality of Health Care
Natural Science Disciplines
Education
Health Services Administration
Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment
Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation
Disciplines and Occupations
Delivery of Health Care
Anthropology, Education, Sociology and Social Phenomena
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Program Evaluation
Investigative Techniques
Research
Evaluation Studies
Universities
Biological Science Disciplines
Education, Graduate
Patient Care Management > methods
Patient Care Management
Patient Care
Doctorat > États-Unis > Évaluation.
Sciences > Étude et enseignement (Supérieur) > États-Unis > Évaluation.
Sciences.
Sciences physiques.
Services de santé > Administration.
Prestation de soins.
Recherche.
Universités.
Sciences de la vie.
Soins médicaux.
sciences (philosophy)
physical sciences.
research (function)
colleges (institutions)
universities (institutions)
biological sciences.
science (modern discipline)
SCIENCE > Research & Methodology.
Universities and colleges
Physical sciences
Medical care
Life sciences
Health services administration
Doctor of philosophy degree > Evaluation
Engineering > Study and teaching (Higher) > Evaluation
Humanities > Study and teaching (Higher) > Evaluation
Research > Evaluation
Science > Study and teaching (Higher) > Evaluation
Onderzoeksprojecten.
Beoordeling.
Évaluation.
Doctorat.
Sciences (Disciplines scientifiques)
Ingénierie.
Recherche universitaire.
United States
États-Unis.
Statistics
Statistics.
Statistiques.
Online Access:Texto completo
Table of Contents:
  • ""FrontMatter""; ""Acknowledgments""; ""Contents""; ""List of Tables and Charts""; ""Executive Summary""; ""1 Introduction""; ""2 How the Study Was Conducted""; ""3 Taxonomy""; ""4 Quantitative Measures""; ""5 Student Education and Outcomes""; ""6 Reputation and Data Presentation""; ""7 General Conclusions and Recommendations""; ""References""; ""Appendixes""; ""Appendix A Committee and Panel Member Biographical Sketches""; ""Appendix B Program-Initiation Consultation with Organizations""; ""Appendix C Meetings and Participants""; ""Appendix D Sample Questionnaires""
  • ""Appendix E Taxonomy of Fields and Their Subfields""""Appendix F Fields for Ph. D.s Granted During 1996-2001""; ""Appendix G Technical and Statistical Techniques""; ""Alternate Ways to Present Rankings: Random Halves and Bootstrap Methods""; ""Correlates of Reputation Analysis""

Similar Items