Perspectives in controversy : selected essays from Contemporary argumentation and debate /
Perspectives in Controversy brings together essays from the journal Contemporary Argumentation and Debate into a single volume. These essays explore current controversies in the theory of competitive academic debate.
Call Number: | Libro Electrónico |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Electronic eBook |
Language: | Inglés |
Published: |
New York :
International Debate Education Association,
2002.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Texto completo |
Table of Contents:
- TABLE OF CONTENTS
- INTRODUCTION
- PART ONE: METHODS OF ARGUMENTATIVE SUPPORT
- AUTHORITY AS ARGUMENT IN ACADEMIC DEBATE
- ARGUMENT BORROWING AND ITS OBLIGATIONS
- PART TWO: THE QUESTION OF CRITICAL THINKING
- THE VALUE OF COMPETITIVE DEBATE AS A VEHICLE FOR PROMOTING DEVELOPMENT OF CRITICAL THINKING ABILITY
- ENHANCING CRITICAL THINKING ABILITY THROUGH ACADEMIC DEBATE
- PART THREE VERSIONS OF CAUSE
- THE APPLICATION OF PROXIMATE CAUSE TO CEDA DEBATE
- DOMINANT FORM AND MARGINALIZED VOICES: ARGUMENTATION ABOUT FEMINISM(S).
- DEBUNKING MINI-MAX REASONING: THE LIMITS OF EXTENDED CAUSAL CHAINS IN CONTEST DEBATING
- COUNTERFACTUAL POSSIBILITIES: CONSTRUCTING COUNTER- TO- FACT CAUSAL CLAIMS
- PART FOUR: FIAT: THE FORCE OF ASSUMED ACTION
- POLICY DEBATE AS FICTION: IN DEFENSE OF UTOPIAN FIAT
- A COUNTERFACTUAL THEORY OF FIAT
- FIAT AND THE CIRCUMVENTION ARGUMENT
- THE DECISION-MAKER
- PART FIVE: CRITIQUES
- EXPANDING THE ARGUMENTATIVE DOMAIN
- A DEFENSE OF CRITIQUE ARGUMENTS: BEYOND THE RESOLUTIONAL QUESTION
- CONTEXTS, TEXTS AND RETEXTS: TEXTUAL ANALYSIS RE- EXAMINED CRITICIZING KRITIKS.