|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a2200000 i 4500 |
001 |
on1061275199 |
003 |
OCoLC |
005 |
20231005004200.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr cnu|||unuuu |
008 |
181106s2019 enka ob 001 0 eng d |
040 |
|
|
|a N$T
|b eng
|e rda
|e pn
|c N$T
|d N$T
|d OCLCF
|d N$T
|d AU@
|d QGK
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9781787431478
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|a 1787431479
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9781787431485
|
029 |
1 |
|
|a AU@
|b 000065427648
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)1061275199
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a HD61
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a BUS
|x 082000
|2 bisacsh
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a BUS
|x 041000
|2 bisacsh
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a BUS
|x 042000
|2 bisacsh
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a BUS
|x 085000
|2 bisacsh
|
082 |
0 |
4 |
|a 658.155
|2 23
|
049 |
|
|
|a UAMI
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Lana, Kay Coble,
|e author.
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Collaborative risk mitigation through construction planning and scheduling :
|b risk doesn't have to be a four letter word /
|c by Lana Kay Coble.
|
250 |
|
|
|a First edtion.
|
264 |
|
1 |
|a Bingley, UK :
|b Emerald Publishing Limited,
|c 2019.
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references and index.
|
588 |
0 |
|
|a Online resource; title from PDF title page (EBSCO, Nov. 7, 2018).
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Synopsis from Industry Professionals -- About the Author -- Purpose of This Book -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- Chapter 1 Has It Ever Gone As Planned? -- 1.1. Change Is the Only Constant -- 1.2. Forms of Risk -- Chapter 2 Who Benefits from Planning and How? -- 2.1. Planning -- 2.2. Scheduling -- 2.3. Risk Identification.
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a 2.4. Benefits -- Chapter 3 Real Construction Mitigation Case Studies -- Case Study #1: Leadership Consistency, Scope Re-Design During Construction, Inflation, And Hurricanes, "Oh, My!" -- 3.1. Project Scope -- 3.2. Key Project Milestone Dates -- 3.3. Practitioner Team Members -- 3.4. Situation and Risks -- 3.5. Mitigation Efforts -- 3.5.1. Leadership Consistency -- 3.5.2. Scope Changes & Schedule Mitigation -- 3.5.3. Budget Control Risk Mitigation -- 3.6. Practices -- 3.6.1. Leadership Consistency Practices -- 3.6.2. Scope Change and Time Management Practices -- 3.6.3. Budget Control Practices.
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a 3.6.4. Environmental Risk Practices -- 3.7. Final Outcome and Benefits -- 3.7.1. Tangibles -- 3.7.2. Intangibles -- 3.8. Summation -- Case Study #2: Team Integration, Decision-Making, and Schedule Reporting, are Critical Factors for Scheduling Success -- 3.9. Project Scope -- 3.10. Key Project Milestone Dates -- 3.11. Practitioner Team Members -- 3.12. Situation and Risks -- 3.13. Mitigation Efforts -- 3.13.1. Team Risk with Integration Mitigation -- 3.13.2. Decision-Making Risk Mitigation -- 3.13.3. Risk Mitigation through Schedule Reporting -- 3.13.4. Environmental Risk Mitigation -- 3.14. Practices.
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a 3.14.1. Team Integration and Decision-Making -- 3.14.2. Information Management and Reporting -- 3.15. Final Outcome and Benefits -- 3.15.1. Tangibles -- 3.15.2. Intangibles -- 3.16. Summation -- Chapter 4 Risk Management Matrix -- 4.1. Part I: Risk Identification -- Owner/End User Perspective -- 4.2. Part II: Risk Identification -- Design and Construction Perspective -- 4.3. Part III: Risk Identification -- Schedule Elements -- Chapter 5 Communicating the Project Schedule and Change Management -- 5.1. Part I: Communicating through Shared Language -- 5.2. Part II: Achieving Mutual Agreement with the Baseline Schedule.
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a 5.3. Part III: Periodic Schedule Reporting -- 5.4. Part IV: Perfecting Contractual Time Extension Requests -- 5.5. Part V: Internal Reporting of Schedule Performance -- 5.6. Part VI: Close-Out Executive Reporting -- Chapter 6 Contingency Planning -- 6.1. Part I: Understanding the Difference Between Contingency and Mitigation -- 6.2. Part II: Reporting a Contingency Plan -- Chapter 7 Implementing Mitigation Measures Through Technological Application of the Computer Scheduling Software -- 7.1. Part I: Technical Parameters of Activities which Reduce Risk.
|
520 |
|
|
|a In the complex, cash-strapped, high pressure world of modern construction, what do you do when something goes wrong? This work looks beyond the best-case scenario to give project managers, contractors, architects and engineers the tools to prepare effectively for the unexpected.
|
590 |
|
|
|a Emerald Insight
|b Emerald All Book Titles
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Construction industry
|x Risk management.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Production scheduling.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Strategic planning.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Construction
|x Industrie
|x Gestion du risque.
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Ordonnancement (Gestion)
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Planification stratégique.
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a BUSINESS & ECONOMICS
|x Industrial Management.
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a BUSINESS & ECONOMICS
|x Management.
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a BUSINESS & ECONOMICS
|x Management Science.
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a BUSINESS & ECONOMICS
|x Organizational Behavior.
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Construction industry
|x Risk management
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Production scheduling
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Strategic planning
|2 fast
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://emerald.uam.elogim.com/insight/publication/doi/10.1108/9781787431478
|z Texto completo
|
938 |
|
|
|a EBSCOhost
|b EBSC
|n 1857503
|
994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b IZTAP
|