Cargando…

The Hidden Inequities in Labor-Based Contract Grading /

"Intervenes in labor-based grading practice by expanding the scope of this assessment practice to include disabled and multiply marginalized students. Critiques the assumption that labor is a neutral measure to assess students and how labor-based grading put certain students at a disadvantage....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Carillo, Ellen C. (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Logan : Utah State University Press, [2021]
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_97758
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905053252.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 210819t20212021utu o 00 0 eng d
010 |z  2021035840 
020 |a 9781646422678 
020 |z 9781646422661 
035 |a (OCoLC)1268119879 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Carillo, Ellen C.,  |e author. 
245 1 4 |a The Hidden Inequities in Labor-Based Contract Grading /   |c Ellen C. Carillo. 
264 1 |a Logan :  |b Utah State University Press,  |c [2021] 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2021 
264 4 |c ©[2021] 
300 |a 1 online resource (83 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 0 |a Current arguments in composition 
505 0 |a Assumptions in labor-based contract grading -- Substituting one standard for another : the normative, laboring body at the Center of Labor-Based Grading Contracts -- Labor-based contract grading and students' mental health -- Labor-based grading contracts and students' intersectional identities -- The effectiveness of labor-based grading contracts -- Forging ahead. 
520 |a "Intervenes in labor-based grading practice by expanding the scope of this assessment practice to include disabled and multiply marginalized students. Critiques the assumption that labor is a neutral measure to assess students and how labor-based grading put certain students at a disadvantage. Offering engagement-based grading as a more equitable assessment model"--  |c Provided by publisher. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 7 |a Learning  |x Evaluation.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00994834 
650 7 |a Grading and marking (Students)  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00945795 
650 7 |a English language  |x Rhetoric  |x Ability testing.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00911582 
650 7 |a College students  |x Rating of.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00868035 
650 7 |a Academic writing  |x Evaluation.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00795095 
650 0 |a Grading and marking (Students)  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Academic writing  |x Evaluation. 
650 0 |a Learning  |x Evaluation. 
650 0 |a College students  |x Rating of. 
650 0 |a English language  |x Rhetoric  |x Ability testing  |z United States. 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/97758/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2021 Complete 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2021 History