|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a22000004a 4500 |
001 |
musev2_95165 |
003 |
MdBmJHUP |
005 |
20230905053139.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr||||||||nn|n |
008 |
100604s2010 nju o 00 0 eng d |
010 |
|
|
|z 2009016183
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9780813546582
|
020 |
|
|
|z 0813546583
|
040 |
|
|
|a MdBmJHUP
|c MdBmJHUP
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Bingham, Dennis,
|d 1954-
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Whose Lives Are They Anyway? :
|b The Biopic as Contemporary Film Genre /
|c Dennis Bingham.
|
264 |
|
1 |
|a New Brunswick, N.J. :
|b Rutgers University Press,
|c 2010.
|
264 |
|
3 |
|a Baltimore, Md. :
|b Project MUSE,
|c 0000
|
264 |
|
4 |
|c ©2010.
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (448 pages):
|b illustrations
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Introduction: a respectable genre of very low repute -- Book one: the great (White) man biopic and its discontents. Strachey's way, or all's well that ends Welles -- Rembrandt (1936) -- Citizen Kane and the biopic -- Lawrence of Arabia: "but does he really deserve a place in here?" -- Nixon, Oliver Stone, and the unmaking of the self-made man -- P.S.: W. -- Thirty two short films about Glenn Gould: ghost picture -- Ed Wood: the biopic of someone undeserving -- Spike Lee's Malcolm X: appropriation or assimilation? -- Raoul Peck's Lumumba: drama, documentary, and the postcolonial appropriation -- Book two: a woman's life is never done: female biopics. Prologue -- Superstar: The Karen Carpenter story: toying with the genre -- I want to live!: criminal woman, male discourses -- Barbra and Julie at the dawning of the Age of Aquarius -- Funny girl -- Star! -- Hacked: Gorillas in the mist and other female biopics in the 1980s -- An angel at my table: re-framing the female biography -- Erin Brockovich: Hollywood feminist revisionism, after a fashion -- Twenty-first-century women -- The notorious Bettie Page: free will, and God's will -- Marie Antoinette: the female biopic gets the guillotine -- I'm not there: some conclusions on a book concerning biopics.
|
520 |
|
|
|a Through detailed analyses and critiques of nearly twenty biopics, Whose Lives Are They Anyway? proves a critical point: The biopic is a genuine, dynamic genre and an important oneùit narrates, exhibits, and celebrates a subject's life and demonstrates, investigates, or questions his or her importance in the world; it illuminates the finer points of a personality; and, ultimately, it provides a medium for both artist and spectator to discover what it would be like to be that person, or a certain type of person.
|
588 |
|
|
|a Description based on print version record.
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Music, Dance, Drama & Film.
|2 hilcc
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Film.
|2 hilcc
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Biographical films.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst00832143
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a SOCIAL SCIENCE
|x Anthropology
|x Cultural.
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a PERFORMING ARTS
|x Film & Video
|x Reference.
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Biographical films
|x History and criticism.
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a Criticism, interpretation, etc.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst01411635
|
655 |
|
4 |
|a Electronic book.
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a Electronic books.
|2 local
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a Project Muse.
|e distributor
|
830 |
|
0 |
|a Book collections on Project MUSE.
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|z Texto completo
|u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/95165/
|
945 |
|
|
|a Project MUSE - Custom Collection
|