Cargando…

If Adam Had Not Sinned : The Reason for the Incarnation from Anselm to Scotus /

Since the twelfth century, theologians have found a counterfactual question irresistible: "If Adam had not sinned, would the Son have become incarnate?" In the latter half of the twentieth century, Hans Urs von Balthasar, Hans Küng, Gerhard Ludwig Müller, Karl Rahner, Karl Barth, Wolfhar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hunter, Justus Hamilton, 1982- (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Washington, D.C. : The Catholic University of America Press, [2020]
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_89708
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905052956.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 191220s2020 dcu o 00 0 eng d
010 |z  2019059120 
020 |a 9780813232867 
020 |z 9780813232850 
035 |a (OCoLC)1153937494 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Hunter, Justus Hamilton,  |d 1982-  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a If Adam Had Not Sinned :   |b The Reason for the Incarnation from Anselm to Scotus /   |c Justus H. Hunter. 
264 1 |a Washington, D.C. :  |b The Catholic University of America Press,  |c [2020] 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2022 
264 4 |c ©[2020] 
300 |a 1 online resource (272 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
505 0 |a The reason for the Incarnation - After Anselm -- Robert Grosseteste -- The Dominicans at Paris -- The Franciscans at Paris -- "Ratio incarnationis" 
520 |a Since the twelfth century, theologians have found a counterfactual question irresistible: "If Adam had not sinned, would the Son have become incarnate?" In the latter half of the twentieth century, Hans Urs von Balthasar, Hans Küng, Gerhard Ludwig Müller, Karl Rahner, Karl Barth, Wolfhart Pannenburg, Jürgen Moltmann, and Robert Jenson all considered this question on the reason, or motive, for the incarnation. Nearly every case refers to the classic disagreement between those who follow Thomas Aquinas and those who follow John Duns Scotus. Though it is common to claim Thomas or Scotus as one's authority, the theological debates among which Thomas and Scotus developed their own positions remain largely neglected. This study fills that gap. If Adam Had Not Sinned is a study of the medieval debates over the motive for the incarnation from Anselm of Canterbury to John Duns Scotus. While the volume is primarily focused on thirteenth-century debates at the University of Paris, it also supplies necessary historical background to those debates. As a result, the larger context within which Thomas Aquinas and John Duns Scotus developed their influential responses is detailed. This larger context permits an analysis that leads to the surprising claim, against widespread assumptions, that the responses given by Thomas and Scotus are substantially reconcilable. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 0 |a Incarnation  |x History of doctrines  |y Middle Ages, 600-1500. 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/89708/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection