Cargando…

Reimagining Human Rights : Religion and the Common Good /

"Jeremy Bentham described the idea of human rights as "rhetorical nonsense." In this book, which is proposed for the Moral Traditions series, William O'Neill shows that the rhetorical aspect of human rights is in fact crucial. He does so by examining how victims and their advocat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: O'Neill, William R. (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Washington, DC : Georgetown University Press, 2021.
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_81395
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905052345.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 210108s2021 dcu o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9781647120368 
020 |z 9781647120344 
020 |z 9781647120351 
035 |a (OCoLC)1229163455 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a O'Neill, William R.,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Reimagining Human Rights :   |b Religion and the Common Good /   |c William R. O'Neill, S.J. 
264 1 |a Washington, DC :  |b Georgetown University Press,  |c 2021. 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2021 
264 4 |c ©2021. 
300 |a 1 online resource (264 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 0 |a Moral traditions 
505 0 |a Interpreting Rights -- Justifying Rights -- Rights and Religion -- Applying Human Rights. 
520 |a "Jeremy Bentham described the idea of human rights as "rhetorical nonsense." In this book, which is proposed for the Moral Traditions series, William O'Neill shows that the rhetorical aspect of human rights is in fact crucial. He does so by examining how victims and their advocates embrace the rhetoric of human rights to tell their stories. It is a history of human rights "from below," showing what victims of atrocity and advocates do with rights. Using a group of American writings, including Desmond Tutu's on the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, O'Neill reconciles the false dichotomy between the individualistic perspective of the human rights theory of Kant, Rousseau, and Rawls and the communitarian approach of Burke, Bentham, and Alasdair Macintyre. He shows that the testimony of the victims of atrocities leads us to a new conception of the common good, based both on abstract theories of individual human rights and the circumstances and history of particular societies. The book then applies this new approach to three areas: race and mass incarceration in the U.S, the politics of immigration and refugee policy, and our duties to the next generation and the non-human world"--  |c Provided by publisher. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 7 |a Social justice.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01122603 
650 7 |a Human rights  |x Moral and ethical aspects.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00963306 
650 7 |a Human rights.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00963285 
650 7 |a Common good.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00869784 
650 7 |a RELIGION / Christian Theology / Ethics  |2 bisacsh 
650 0 |a Common good. 
650 0 |a Social justice. 
650 0 |a Human rights. 
650 0 |a Human rights  |x Moral and ethical aspects. 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/81395/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2021 Complete 
945 |a Project MUSE - 2021 Philosophy and Religion