|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a22000004a 4500 |
001 |
musev2_75692 |
003 |
MdBmJHUP |
005 |
20230905051822.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr||||||||nn|n |
008 |
191106s2020 ksu o 00 0 eng d |
010 |
|
|
|z 2019039082
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9780700629268
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9780700629251
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)1127068748
|
040 |
|
|
|a MdBmJHUP
|c MdBmJHUP
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Sheahan, Luke C.,
|e author.
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Why Associations Matter :
|b The Case for First Amendment Pluralism /
|c Luke C. Sheahan.
|
264 |
|
1 |
|a Lawrence, Kansas :
|b University Press of Kansas,
|c [2020]
|
264 |
|
3 |
|a Baltimore, Md. :
|b Project MUSE,
|c 2020
|
264 |
|
4 |
|c ©[2020]
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (248 pages).
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Political Sociology and the Problem of the Vanishing Freedom of Association -- Pluralism and the "Social" Nature of the Social Group -- The First Amendment Dichotomy and Freedom of Association: State and Individual from NAACP v. Alabama to Christian Legal Society v. Martinez -- First Amendment Pluralism: Authority, Allegiance, and the Functional Autonomy Test -- Conclusion: First Amendment Pluralism and the Freedom of Association.
|
520 |
|
|
|a "First Amendment rights are hailed as the hallmark of the American constitutional system, protecting religious liberty, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of association from government interference. In Christian Legal Society v. Martinez (2010), however, the Supreme Court demoted freedom of association in the panoply of First Amendment rights. This decline in protection for freedom of association has broad ramifications for the constitutional status of voluntary associations in civil society. Why Associations Matter examines how a fundamental right disappeared from the Supreme Court's reasoning and draws on the political sociology of Robert Nisbet to develop a theoretical framework for bolstering freedom of association in American constitutionalism. Luke Sheahan shows that the case law from NAACP v. Alabama (1958) through Boy Scouts v. Dale (2000) has recognized free association only as an individual right of expressive association derived from the Speech Clause alone. This pattern in Supreme Court jurisprudence culminated in Martinez, in which the Supreme Court refused to uphold the associational right of a student group at a public university to police its own membership based upon the purpose of the group. Sheahan argues that the association case law is flawed at a fundamental level and turns to Nisbet, whose sociological work exposes the problem with a focus on the state and individual to the neglect of nonpolitical associations and institutions"--
|c Provided by publisher.
|
588 |
|
|
|a Description based on print version record.
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Freedom of association.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst00934011
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Associations, institutions, etc.
|x Law and legislation.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst00819193
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a POLITICAL SCIENCE / American Government / National
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
6 |
|a Liberte d'association
|z États-Unis.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Associations, institutions, etc.
|x Law and legislation
|z United States.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Freedom of association
|z United States.
|
651 |
|
7 |
|a United States.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst01204155
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a Electronic books.
|2 local
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a Project Muse.
|e distributor
|
830 |
|
0 |
|a Book collections on Project MUSE.
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|z Texto completo
|u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/75692/
|
945 |
|
|
|a Project MUSE - Custom Collection
|
945 |
|
|
|a Project MUSE - 2020 Complete
|
945 |
|
|
|a Project MUSE - 2020 Political Science and Policy Studies
|