|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a22000004a 4500 |
001 |
musev2_7273 |
003 |
MdBmJHUP |
005 |
20230905040835.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr||||||||nn|n |
008 |
120411r20122008miu o 00 0 eng d |
020 |
|
|
|a 9780472022953
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9780472034154
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9780472116621
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)698586726
|
040 |
|
|
|a MdBmJHUP
|c MdBmJHUP
|
043 |
|
|
|a e-uk---
|a n-us---
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a K3367
|b .E325 2008
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 347/.012
|2 22
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Edlin, Douglas E.
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Judges and Unjust Laws :
|b Common Law Constitutionalism and the Foundations of Judicial Review /
|c Douglas E. Edlin.
|
264 |
|
1 |
|a Ann Arbor [Mich.] :
|b University of Michigan Press,
|c 2008
|
264 |
|
3 |
|a Baltimore, Md. :
|b Project MUSE,
|c 2012
|
264 |
|
4 |
|c ©2008
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (335 pages):
|b digital file.
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
500 |
|
|
|a Issued as part of book collections on Project MUSE.
|
504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references (p. 283-299) and index.
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a The common law -- The source-based argument for the judicial obligation to apply the law -- The conceptual argument for the judicial obligation to apply the law -- The source-based argument for the judicial obligation to develop the law : part I (England) -- The source-based argument for the judicial obligation to develop the law : part II (United States) -- The conceptual argument for the judicial obligation to develop the law -- Common law review -- Common law review in two common law systems.
|
506 |
|
|
|a Access restricted to authorized users and institutions.
|
520 |
|
|
|a With keen insight into the common law mind, Edlin argues that there are rich resources within the law for judges to ground their opposition to morally outrageous laws, and a legal obligation on them to overturn it, consequent on the general common law obligation to develop the law. Thus, seriously unjust laws pose for common law judges a dilemma within the law, not just a moral challenge to the law, a conflict of obligations, not just a crisis of conscience. While rooted firmly in the history of common law jurisprudence, Edlin offers an entirely fresh perspective on an age-old jurisprudential conundrum.
|
588 |
|
|
|a Description based on print version record.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Judicial review
|z United States.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Judicial review
|z Great Britain.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Judge-made law
|z United States.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Judge-made law
|z Great Britain.
|
655 |
|
7 |
|a Electronic books.
|2 local
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a Project Muse.
|
776 |
1 |
8 |
|i Print version:
|z 0472116622
|z 9780472116621
|w (DLC) 2008017464
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a Project Muse.
|e distributor
|
830 |
|
0 |
|a Book collections on Project MUSE.
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|z Texto completo
|u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/7273/
|
945 |
|
|
|a Project MUSE - Custom Collection
|
945 |
|
|
|a Project MUSE - Archive Complete Foundation
|
945 |
|
|
|a Project MUSE - Archive Political Science and Policy Studies Foundation
|