Cargando…

Moral Wisdom and Good Lives /

Kekes argues further that the liberal conceptions of equality, justice, and pluralism require treating good and evil people with equal respect, distributing resources without regard to what recipients deserve, and restricting choices to those that conform to liberal preconceptions. All these policie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kekes, John
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Ithaca : Cornell University Press, 1997.
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_72569
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905051454.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 960917s1997 nyu o 00 0 eng d
010 |z  96044864  
020 |a 9781501721861 
020 |z 9780801482786 
020 |z 9780801431715 
035 |a (OCoLC)1227050887 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Kekes, John. 
245 1 0 |a Moral Wisdom and Good Lives /   |c John Kekes. 
264 1 |a Ithaca :  |b Cornell University Press,  |c 1997. 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2021 
264 4 |c ©1997. 
300 |a 1 online resource (256 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
505 0 |a 1. What Is Liberalism? -- 2. The Prevalence of Evil -- 3. Individual Responsibility -- 4. Collective Responsibility -- 5. The Errors of Egalitarianism -- 6. Justice and Desert -- 7. Justice without the Liberal Faith -- 8. Pluralism versus Liberalism -- 9. The Sentimentalism of Benevolence -- 10. What Is Wrong with Liberalism? 
520 8 |a Kekes argues further that the liberal conceptions of equality, justice, and pluralism require treating good and evil people with equal respect, distributing resources without regard to what recipients deserve, and restricting choices to those that conform to liberal preconceptions. All these policies are detrimental to good lives. Kekes concludes that liberalism cannot cope with the prevalence of evil, that it is vitiated by inconsistent commitments, and that - contrary to its aim - liberalism is an obstacle to good lives. 
520 |a Liberalism is doomed to failure, John Kekes argues in this penetrating criticism of its basic assumptions. Liberals favor individual autonomy, a wide plurality of choices, and equal rights and resources, seeing them as essential for good lives. They oppose such evils as selfishness, intolerance, cruelty, and greed. Yet the more autonomy, equality, and pluralism there is, Kekes contends, the greater is the scope for evil. According to Kekes, liberalism is inconsistent because the conditions liberals regard as essential for good lives actually foster the very evils liberals want to avoid, and avoiding those evils depends on conditions contrary to the ones liberals favor. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 1 7 |a Liberalisme.  |2 gtt 
650 7 |a Liberalism  |x Moral and ethical aspects.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00997187 
650 7 |a Liberalism.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00997183 
650 6 |a Liberalisme  |x Aspect moral. 
650 6 |a Liberalisme. 
650 0 |a Liberalism  |x Moral and ethical aspects. 
650 0 |a Liberalism. 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/72569/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection 
945 |a Project MUSE - Archive Complete Supplement IX 
945 |a Project MUSE - Archive Philosophy and Religion Supplement IX