MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_70512
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905051254.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 100414t19991999ncu o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9780822398202 
020 |z 9780822323280 
035 |a (OCoLC)1157995278 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Popkin, William D.,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Statutes in Court :   |b The History and Theory of Statutory Interpretation /   |c William D. Popkin. 
264 1 |a London :  |b Duke University Press,  |c 1999. 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2020 
264 4 |c ©1999. 
300 |a 1 online resource (352 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
505 0 |a English history -- The United States: from the Revolution to the founding -- The United States: nineteenth century -- From 1900 to the 1960s: purposive interpretation -- Giving judges as little to do as possible: the rise of modern textualism -- Giving judges something to do: Republicanism and substantive canons -- Ordinary judging. 
520 8 |a Annotation  |b How do judges determine the meaning of laws? The extent to which judges should exercise their discretion in interpreting legislation has been a contentious issue throughout American history, involving questions about the balance of power between the legislature and the judiciary. In Statutes in Court William D. Popkin provides an indispensable survey of the history of American statutory interpretation and then offers his own theory of "ordinary judging" that defines the proper scope of judicial discretion. Popkin begins by discussing the British origins of statutory interpretation in this country. He then maps the evolving conceptions of the judicial role in the United States from Revolutionary times through the twentieth century before presenting his "ordinary judging" theory--one that asks the judge to use modest judicial discretion to assist the legislature in implementing good government. Claiming that theory cannot account for everything a judge does when determining statutory meaning or writing an opinion, Popkin shows how judges who strive to be conscientious in interpreting the law are often hampered by the lack of both a framework in which to fit their approach and a well-understood common vocabulary to explain what they do. Statutes in Court fills that gap. This work will be valuable to anyone concerned about the judicial role in the interpretation of laws--from judiciary officials and law professors to legal historians and political scientists. 
546 |a English. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 7 |a Pouvoir discretionnaire des juges  |z Etats-Unis  |x Histoire.  |2 ram 
650 7 |a Droit  |x Interpretation  |z Etats-Unis  |x Histoire.  |2 ram 
650 7 |a Law  |x Interpretation and construction.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00993756 
650 7 |a Judicial discretion.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00984652 
650 7 |a LAW / Legal Profession  |2 bisacsh 
650 6 |a Pouvoir discretionnaire des juges. 
650 6 |a Droit  |x Interpretation. 
650 6 |a Pouvoir discretionnaire des juges  |z États-Unis  |x Histoire. 
650 6 |a Droit  |z États-Unis  |x Interpretation  |x Histoire. 
650 0 |a Judicial discretion. 
650 0 |a Law  |x Interpretation and construction. 
650 0 |a Judicial discretion  |z United States  |x History. 
650 0 |a Law  |z United States  |x Interpretation and construction  |x History. 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
655 7 |a History.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01411628 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/70512/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection