Reconsidering Judicial Finality : Why the Supreme Court Is Not the Last Word on the Constitution /

Mostrar otras versiones (1)

Federal judges, legal scholars, pundits, and reporters frequently describe the Supreme Court as the final word on the meaning of the Constitution. The historical record presents an entirely different picture. A close and revealing reading of that record, from 1789 to the present day, Reconsidering J...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Fisher, Louis (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Lawrence, Kansas : University Press of Kansas, [2019]
Colección:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Temas:
United States. > Supreme Court.
États-Unis. > Supreme Court.
Political questions and judicial power.
Judicial power.
Constitutional law.
POLITICAL SCIENCE > American Government > Judicial Branch.
Pouvoir judiciaire > États-Unis.
Politique et pouvoir judiciaire > États-Unis.
Constitutional law > United States.
Judicial power > United States.
Political questions and judicial power > United States.
United States.
Electronic books.
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Early claims of judicial finality
  • Selections by Chief Justice Hughes
  • Rights of blacks
  • Rights of women
  • Regulating commerce
  • The sole-organ doctrine
  • Privacy rights
  • Religious liberty
  • Japanese-American cases
  • State secrets privilege
  • Legislative vetoes
  • Campaign finance.

Ejemplares similares