MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_66791
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20230905050857.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 180512e20170725cau o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9781947447035 
020 |z 9781947447028 
035 |a (OCoLC)1050958025 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
245 0 0 |a Urban Re-Industrialization 
264 1 |a Goleta :  |b Punctum Books  |c July 2017. 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2019 
264 4 |c ©July 2017. 
300 |a 1 online resource (186 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |f Unrestricted online access  |2 star 
520 8 |a Annotation  |b Urban re-industrialisation could be seen as a method of increasing business effectiveness in the context of a politically stimulated `green economy; it could also be seen as a nostalgic mutation of a creative-class concept, focused on 3D printing, `boutique manufacturing and crafts. These two notions place urban re-industrialisation within the context of the current neoliberal economic regime and urban development based on property and land speculation. Could urban re-industrialisation be a more radical idea? Could urban re-industrialization be imagined as a progressive socio-political and economic project, aimed at creating an inclusive and democratic society based on cooperation and a symbiosis that goes way beyond the current model of a neoliberal city?In January 2012, against the backdrop of the 2008 financial crisis, Krzysztof Nawratek published a text in opposition to the fantasy of a `cappuccino city, arguing that the post-industrial city is a fiction, and that it should be replaced by `Industrial City 2.0. Industrial City 2.0 is an attempt to see a post-socialist and post-industrial city from another perspective, a kind of negative of the modernist industrial city. If, for logistical reasons and because of a concern for the health of residents, modernism tried to separate different functions from each other (mainly industry from residential areas), Industrial City 2.0 is based on the ideas of coexistence, proximity, and synergy. The essays collected here envision the possibilities (as well as the possible perils) of such a scheme. 
521 |a Scholarly & Professional  |b Punctum Books. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 7 |a Urban renewal  |x Economic aspects  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01162549 
650 7 |a Industrialization  |x Economic aspects  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00971828 
650 7 |a Industrial policy  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00971433 
650 7 |a Economic development  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00901785 
650 7 |a Commercial policy  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00869569 
650 7 |a City planning  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00862177 
650 7 |a Urban & municipal planning.  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a economic development.  |2 aat 
650 6 |a Industrialisation  |x Aspect economique. 
650 6 |a Politique industrielle. 
650 6 |a Developpement economique. 
650 6 |a Politique commerciale. 
650 6 |a Renovation urbaine  |x Aspect economique. 
650 0 |a Industrialization  |x Economic aspects. 
650 0 |a Industrial policy. 
650 0 |a Economic development. 
650 0 |a Commercial policy. 
650 0 |a City planning. 
650 0 |a Urban renewal  |x Economic aspects. 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
700 1 |a Nawratek, Krzysztof,  |e editor  |4 edt 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Texto completo  |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/66791/