Cargando…
Meaningful Grading : A Guide for Faculty in the Arts /
College and university faculty in the arts (visual, studio, language, music, design, and others) regularly grade and assess undergraduate student work but often with little guidance or support. As a result, many arts faculty, especially new faculty, adjunct faculty, and graduate student instructors,...
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Morgantown :
West Virginia University Press,
2018.
|
| Edición: | First edition. |
| Colección: | Book collections on Project MUSE.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000004a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | musev2_62886 | ||
| 003 | MdBmJHUP | ||
| 005 | 20230905050454.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr||||||||nn|n | ||
| 008 | 180330s2018 wvu o 00 0 eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781946684509 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781946684493 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781946684486 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1066188866 | ||
| 040 | |a MdBmJHUP |c MdBmJHUP | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Haugnes, Natasha, |d 1965- |e author. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Meaningful Grading : |b A Guide for Faculty in the Arts / |c Natasha Haugnes, Hoag Holmgren, and Martin Springborg. |
| 250 | |a First edition. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Morgantown : |b West Virginia University Press, |c 2018. | |
| 264 | 3 | |a Baltimore, Md. : |b Project MUSE, |c 2018 | |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©2018. | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (215 pages): |b illustrations | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Intro; Contents; Introduction; Part I. Course Design and Preparation; 1. Quantifying the Qualitative; 2. Examining Aesthetic Sensibility; 3. The Apprenticeship of Observation; 4. Novices and Experts; 5. Getting Involved; 6. Implications of Grades; 7. Course Design: An Overview; 8. Course Design: Defining Goals; 9. Course Design: Teaching and Learning Activities; 10. Course Design: Assessment Criteria; 11. Your Grading System: Math Matters; 12. Ungraded Assignments; 13. Scaffolding Learning Tasks; 14. Soliciting Feedback; Part I. Supplementary Resources; Part II. During the Semester. | |
| 505 | 0 | |a 15. Making Grading Expectations Clear16. A Mutual Understanding of Progress; 17. Clarifying Teaching Methods; 18. Choice of Graded Projects; 19. Office Hours; 20. Making Creative Process Explicit; 21. Redefining Effort; 22. Problem Finding; 23. Generating Ideas and Brainstorming; 24. Aha! Moments; 25. Grading and Mistakes; 26. Contemplative Practice; 27. Famous Artists' Early Work; 28. The Artist-Apprentice Dynamic; 29. Grading Participation; 30. Grading Discussions; 31. Self-Assessment and Creative Process; 32. The Language of the Discipline; 33. Assessing Research. | |
| 505 | 0 | |a 34. Skills-Based Assignments35. Creating Rubrics; 36. Using Rubrics; 37. When to Introduce a Rubric; 38. Student-Generated Rubrics; 39. Rubrics for Peer and Self-Assessment; 40. Common Rubric Pitfalls; 41. Structuring the Critique; 42. Critiquing in the Online Environment; 43. Peer Critique; 44. Art Directing vs. Critiquing; 45. Critique Journals; Part II. Supplementary Resources; Part III. Post-semester; 46. Requesting Feedback on Your Grading; 47. Post-semester Community: Moving Beyond Assessment; 48. Reflecting and Planning for Next Semester; 49. End-of-Semester Evaluations. | |
| 505 | 0 | |a 50. Norming Your GradesPart III. Supplementary Resources; Acknowledgements; Notes. | |
| 520 | |a College and university faculty in the arts (visual, studio, language, music, design, and others) regularly grade and assess undergraduate student work but often with little guidance or support. As a result, many arts faculty, especially new faculty, adjunct faculty, and graduate student instructors, feel bewildered and must "reinvent the wheel" when grappling with the challenges and responsibilities of grading and assessing student work. Meaningful Grading: A Guide for Faculty in the Arts enables faculty to create and implement effective assessment methodologies--research based and field tested--in traditional and online classrooms. In doing so, the book reveals how the daunting challenges of grading in the arts can be turned into opportunities for deeper student learning, increased student engagement, and an enlivened pedagogy. | ||
| 588 | |a Description based on print version record. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Grading and marking (Students) |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst00945795 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a College students |x Rating of. |2 fast |0 (OCoLC)fst00868035 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a EDUCATION |x Administration |x General. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a EDUCATION |x Organizations & Institutions. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Étudiants |x Évaluation. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Étudiants en art |x Évaluation. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Classement et notation (Éleves et etudiants) | |
| 650 | 0 | |a College students |x Rating of. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Art students |x Rating of. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Grading and marking (Students) | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Arts |x Study and teaching (Higher) |x Evaluation. | |
| 655 | 7 | |a Electronic books. |2 local | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Holmgren, Hoag, |e author. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Springborg, Martin, |e author. | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Project Muse. |e distributor | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Book collections on Project MUSE. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |z Texto completo |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/62886/ |
| 945 | |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection | ||
| 945 | |a Project MUSE - 2018 Complete | ||
| 945 | |a Project MUSE - 2018 Higher Education | ||