Cargando…
The End of Strategic Stability? : Nuclear Weapons and the Challenge of Regional Rivalries /
During the Cold War, many believed that the superpowers shared a conception of strategic stability, a coexistence where both sides would compete for global influence but would be deterred from using nuclear weapons. In actuality, both sides understood strategic stability and deterrence quite differe...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | , |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Baltimore, Maryland :
Project Muse,
2018
|
| Colección: | Book collections on Project MUSE.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000004a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | musev2_62334 | ||
| 003 | MdBmJHUP | ||
| 005 | 20230905050420.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr||||||||nn|n | ||
| 008 | 181109s2018 dcu o 00 0 eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781626166042 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781626166035 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781626166028 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1031433962 | ||
| 040 | |a MdBmJHUP |c MdBmJHUP | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a U263 |b .E557 2018 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 355/.033 |2 23 | |
| 245 | 0 | 4 | |a The End of Strategic Stability? : |b Nuclear Weapons and the Challenge of Regional Rivalries / |c Lawrence Rubin and Adam N. Stulberg, editors. |
| 264 | 1 | |a Baltimore, Maryland : |b Project Muse, |c 2018 | |
| 264 | 3 | |a Baltimore, Md. : |b Project MUSE, |c 2018 | |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©2018 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (324 pages). | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Issued as part of book collections on Project MUSE. | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Part I. General approaches to regional stability -- Sources of instability in the second nuclear age : an American perspective / Evan Braden Montgomery -- The Russian approach to strategic stability : preserving a classical formula in a turbulent world / Andrey Pavlov and Anastasia Malygina -- Pakistan's view of strategic stability : a struggle between theory and practice / Sadia Tasleem -- Strategic stability in the Middle East : through the transparency lens / Emily B. Landau -- Beyond strategic stability: deterrence, regional balance and Iranian national security / Annie Tracy Samuel -- Conclusion to Part I : Regional approaches to strategic stability / Rajesh Basrur -- Part II. Cross-domain deterrence and strategic stability -- Strategic stability and cross-domain coercion : the Russian approach to information (cyber) warfare / Dmitry "Dima" Adamsky -- Conventional challenges to strategic stability : Chinese perceptions of hypersonic technology and the security dilemma / Tong Zhao -- and The India-Pakistan nuclear dyad : strategic stability and cross-domain deterrence / Happymon Jacob -- The road not taken : defining Israel's approach to strategic stability / Ilai Saltzman -- Maintaining sovereignty and preserving the regime : how Saudi Arabia views strategic stability / Ala' Alrababa'h -- Conclusion to Part II : Regional variations on deterrence and stability / Jeffrey W. Knopf -- Part III. Findings and implications -- Foreign views of strategic stability and US nuclear posture: the need for tailored strategies / Matthew Kroenig -- Implications for U.S. policy : defending a stable international system / Adam Mount. | |
| 506 | |a Access restricted to authorized users and institutions. | ||
| 520 | |a During the Cold War, many believed that the superpowers shared a conception of strategic stability, a coexistence where both sides would compete for global influence but would be deterred from using nuclear weapons. In actuality, both sides understood strategic stability and deterrence quite differently. Today's international system is further complicated by more nuclear powers, regional rivalries, and nonstate actors who punch above their weight, but the United States and other nuclear powers still cling to old conceptions of strategic stability. The purpose of this book is to unpack and examine how different states in different regions view strategic stability, the use or non-use of nuclear weapons, and whether or not strategic stability is still a prevailing concept. The contributors to this volume explore policies of current and potential nuclear powers including the United States, Russia, China, India, Iran, Israel, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia. This volume makes an important contribution toward understanding how nuclear weapons will impact the international system in the twenty-first century and will be useful to students, scholars, and practitioners of nuclear weapons policy. | ||
| 588 | |a Description based on print version record. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Military policy. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Security, International. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Deterrence (Strategy) | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Strategic forces. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Nuclear weapons |x Government policy. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Nuclear crisis stability. | |
| 655 | 7 | |a Electronic books. |2 local | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Stulberg, Adam N., |d 1963- |e editor. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rubin, Lawrence, |d 1973- |e editor. | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Project Muse, |e distributor. | |
| 776 | 1 | 8 | |i Print version: |w (DLC) 2017053582 |z 9781626166035 |
| 710 | 2 | |a Project Muse. |e distributor | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Book collections on Project MUSE. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |z Texto completo |u https://projectmuse.uam.elogim.com/book/62334/ |
| 945 | |a Project MUSE - Custom Collection | ||
| 945 | |a Project MUSE - 2018 Complete | ||
| 945 | |a Project MUSE - 2018 Political Science and Policy Studies | ||